unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bengt Richter <bokr@bokr.com>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>, 51787@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#51787: Disk performance on ci.guix.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:36:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220183651.GA8380@LionPure> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o85bjjpm.fsf@gnu.org>

On +2021-12-20 17:59:33 +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> > This is still pretty bad, but better than the <1M performance suggested
> > by previous runs.
> 
> Mmh interesting, I also have a x10 speed up on sdb by increasing the
> block size from 4k to 512k. I'm not sure what conclusion should we draw
> from this observation.
> 
> In particular for our most urging matter, /gnu/store/trash
> removal. Moving to a faster hard drive would definitely help here, but I
> still don't understand if that disk performance regression comes from
> Linux, the file-system fragmentation, or the disk itself.
> 
> >    READ: bw=1547MiB/s (1622MB/s), 1547MiB/s-1547MiB/s (1622MB/s-1622MB/s), io=3055MiB (3203MB), run=1975-1975msec
> >   WRITE: bw=527MiB/s (553MB/s), 527MiB/s-527MiB/s (553MB/s-553MB/s), io=1042MiB (1092MB), run=1975-1975msec
> 
> Wooh that's fast! On test could be to copy the /gnu/store/trash content
> to the SAN an observe how long that it takes for this operating to
> complete.

also might be interesting to copy to /dev/null
to see read rate alone on /gnu/store?

> 
> Thanks for your support on that complex topic :)
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter




      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <875yrjpi1y.fsf@elephly.net>
2021-12-20 16:59 ` bug#51787: Disk performance on ci.guix.gnu.org Mathieu Othacehe
2021-12-20 17:05   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-12-20 21:53     ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-12-21 17:26       ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-12-21 17:51         ` Leo Famulari
2021-12-21 18:23         ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-12-21 23:20         ` Bengt Richter
2021-12-22  0:27         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-12-25 22:19         ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-12-26  8:53           ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-12-30 10:44             ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-12-20 18:36   ` Bengt Richter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211220183651.GA8380@LionPure \
    --to=bokr@bokr.com \
    --cc=51787@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).