From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id WDDsIaPrZWHvuQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:10:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4HN/HaPrZWHGFAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:10:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B451088E for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maO6E-0006Uq-4b for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:10:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maO66-0006Ud-9j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:10:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maO65-0000zY-So for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maO65-0000AI-Mv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42162: gforge.inria.fr to be taken off-line in Dec. 2020 Resent-From: raingloom Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42162 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 42162@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.1634069376495 (code B ref -1); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:10:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2021 20:09:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maO5g-00007s-08 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:09:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1maO5e-00007d-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:09:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maO5d-00064C-O5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:09:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1maO5b-0000dL-Nq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:09:33 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HTRZx2ttWzF4m7 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:09:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1634069369; bh=DIT3XgZL2XOqn9yHmBTKzZxx/K+10lSBUDJbMHaptGI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r0zOWK3e90AxxTXUS6Y2qO1gh+xikX+9XzUXJ/8ExdsNcPv1HFA8eUBqdvIKvMMCq CuqxutNeDytuEFk952gAf08j/ZjSTHAO2dI93JOYNfIh5WHUeNvl3O4jZYEwo5ZP0v hhzbz0kJcHvazKRdbPeY0w+IQOilVTdrv0rKFe3M= X-Riseup-User-ID: F816B205D43FB90A502DF08DA34CF39D5BC9B48B168C523DF1EF82284C723D94 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HTRZw580fz5vS1 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 19:29:36 +0200 From: raingloom Message-ID: <20211009192936.64a1ed01@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87o880byyz.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87a6tdce94.fsf@inria.fr> <87mu4iv0gc.fsf@inria.fr> <87v9c0ap22.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87wnmsn5lz.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87bl44vfvg.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87o880byyz.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1634069410; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=q7qe+YONknzXbGq9cpPPzpslyzjJJqapUbMENQ2X+2E=; b=ipJya5WkA6DYkEr3zxewRRHb4eYEc3TTt2HrnAItbYUnbdMfr7GsaSLtC6FpWNQLBvU0z3 PKc0Il/TIfssTWStWlWgzExyvi4pW6vzum7YMqLl1mYr80FLcVqj98zv9GkT4LWn8N3aSC 3/DUGeGa8ZOPr4H3oz4srnpF7f0hAg/kelpdWGhEr2OrhbDqPByXsMsEVcraVAsuQpOSsq pVGro7DkjXcbLc4ygNuy5f2y2yqzWvq7m7ncXJdhxkiKTQ4RV0yCI/kc7u0FQUmSV5Qkyh QlxJEYf9LweFyLzwTSUuxBLZJXp/Bu/HkjHk/Rq2BkZyTQrT0+mGoFWYUIBbBw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1634069410; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=B54uR3X1woHumbVftfK79oxRVh4aND8S00G8zCQzdy2fbQnSad0kifRVfZGKR4sgHoIhZT io+nkd71yIYG2oOVnrN71ILszB1Gv8b77e3v6/TjO+GUiJ1DVOeJLBo1jAbnDKMi6lYKse eg4yOrn35W7jQ+6Zq58iXyiMp9bc9zo6kl5BWv89p+kYgNv6UdLF/sjrVWUbFZcHnsAMwy 0L8VDsHYWpjrTrBpM+rgx2EBbok9Nc1T6KS10zedZimxzVBNve4CvwKxSZN3refSB3Cy5M bBSjCvxH94vBXzrS/GytYLqjflMnBMMgFJ/Ui82CBkzBbyEEQClFjL7d9LolUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=r0zOWK3e; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.18 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=r0zOWK3e; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E2B451088E X-Spam-Score: 1.18 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pmbTLubz1J8j On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 18:07:16 +0200 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi! >=20 > zimoun skribis: >=20 > > Euh, I do not understand. From bug#43442 [1] on Wed, 16 Sep 2020, > > Scotch was not missing. And from [2] neither. > > > > Nah, the hole is the (double) update (from 6.0.6 to 6.1.0 then > > 6.1.1) without manually taking care of this bug report; by > > switching from url-fetch to git-fetch for instance. Somehow, it > > was bounded to happen because we lack automatic tools despite the > > fact they are there. > > > > Indeed, hard to believe. :-) =20 >=20 > I guess, in our mind, the problem was fixed long ago. :-) >=20 > > As I am asking in this thread [3], the Guix project has the > > ressource, storage speaking, to archive these tarballs -- waiting a > > robust long-term automatic system. But we (the Guix projet) cannot > > because we duplicate the effort on keeping twice all the build > > outputs. Somehow, between Berlin and Bordeaux, coherent policies > > for conservancy are missing. IMHO. =20 >=20 > So I think we=E2=80=99re lucky that we can try different solutions at onc= e. >=20 > The best solution is the one that won=E2=80=99t rely solely on the Guix > project: SWH + Disarchive. We=E2=80=99re getting there! >=20 > The second-best solution is to improve our tooling so we can actually > keep source code in a more controlled way. That=E2=80=99s what I had in = mind > with . We have storage space > for that on berlin, but it=E2=80=99s not infinite. >=20 > Another approach is to use =E2=80=98git-fetch=E2=80=99 more, at least for > non-Autotools packages (that=E2=80=99s the case for Scotch, for instance.) Out of curiosity, why only non-autotools?