On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:10:44 -0500 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:03:09PM +0100, Björn Höfling wrote: > > Note: we also have asciidoc@9.0.1 (package asciidoc-py3). It might > > be possible to use v9 instead of the old asciidoc@8? > > > > Björn > > > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix build -S asciidoc --no-substitutes > > > > [..] > > > > r:sha256 hash mismatch > > for /gnu/store/925a6d936ihbqc7vaf9qkim4f4myjm0r-asciidoc-8.6.10-checkout: > > expected hash: 1hrqkgjmp1gq3f9rkbr8l0y62fzvwb9n8ys35s25bg2ld04y4g4y > > actual hash: 1wwxm789iqanqfabbhm29vma0cfv0kp02srkxhi6vyr752m8i3mg > > hash mismatch for store item > > '/gnu/store/925a6d936ihbqc7vaf9qkim4f4myjm0r-asciidoc-8.6.10-checkout' > > For comparison, I've attached a tarball that unpacks the "expected" > source checkout. Hi Leo, thanks for this package. This information was quite useful when diffing. This is "interesting": We referenced the git-checkout not by commit, but by version-tag. They redirected the repository to https://github.com/asciidoc-py/asciidoc-py And they rewrote the old commits (!) to use python3. The "original" Python2 version is here: https://github.com/asciidoc-py/asciidoc-py2 Fixed with commit 53c40b3c77492740458a7b52723128c12c53d55b Björn