On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:41:53PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Hi Efraim, > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 21:30, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > >> > I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls > >> > I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below > >> > I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list > >> > anymore. > >> > >> I think #44688 [1] fixes it. Please let me know. > >> > >> 1: > > > > I had hoped for a unified list of the missing packages between the two > > or more build machines but the separate output is also useful. With a > > unified list it's possible to see which packages are missing overall and > > need fixing/building. > > Ah, this a feature request. ;-) I agree it could be really helpful. > Lets merge 44688 anyway, it does address something that's lacking. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted