From: bokr@oz.net
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 43986@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43986: core-updates' grep and coreutils fail strerror_r and perror2 tests in gnulib-tests on armhf-on-aarch64
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201017185957.GA2851@LionPure> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201017121923.48d8e85a@scratchpost.org>
Hi Danny,
On +2020-10-17 12:20:11 +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> How do I debug this?
>
> $ guix-core-updates/guix/pre-inst-env guix environment -s armhf-linux --pure grep
>
> needs grep (it's in the implicit native inputs), and that grep has a test failure.
What if the test failure tested a grep feature that you don't actually need from the implicit native input grep?
Is there no way to use a fully valid subset of a tool's functionality (that excludes irrelevant test failures
of unused broken functionality) if there's a test failure in testing everything?
If one could express a dependency on a limited subset by passing also a required-features list, à la ACL?,
maybe dependencies could trigger less builds, and the feature lists might reveal opportunities
for optimizing out some dependencies, e.g. where a bash shell's one or two grep invocations might
depend on grep only for a regex match that might easily be rewritten with bash's own built-in '=~'
One could imagine builds producing ELFs with bitvectors flagging features built and tested,
for efficient dynamic safe-capability determination re usage by dependents, but I better stop rambling.
So, monolith dependencies vs factoring, how to balance?
>
> So I can't actually enter the environment for building grep and running
>
> make check
>
> .
>
> What now?
HTWNEU -- Hope This Was Not Entirely Useless :)
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-17 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-14 10:41 bug#43986: core-updates' grep and coreutils fail strerror_r and perror2 tests in gnulib-tests on armhf-on-aarch64 Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-17 10:20 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-17 18:59 ` bokr [this message]
2020-10-18 22:45 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-20 7:22 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-21 16:04 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-21 17:03 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-18 22:49 ` Marius Bakke
2020-10-21 10:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201017185957.GA2851@LionPure \
--to=bokr@oz.net \
--cc=43986@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=bokr@bokr.com \
--cc=dannym@scratchpost.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).