From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uLOQDVXIYl97RwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:22:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iPl0CVXIYl8NFwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:22:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A539403C5 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjYp-0007dR-AH for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:22:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjYi-0007dJ-0c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:22:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjYh-0001UM-NY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:22:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjYg-00031S-7p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43344: "basic" system tests fail (and all the other ones) on guix master Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43344 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Received: via spool by 43344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43344.160030928611567 (code B ref 43344); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 43344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2020 02:21:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36991 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjY6-00030V-4E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:26 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIjY4-00030H-Tv for 43344@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:25 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B85C0150; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=mWgQ8m1ZPQD7hb8IxDNoVrRd zYgCvDcbXNSvonDeb24=; b=NY6ozBJsBP7HvJWMUdVSX9mFYPyI2/9vcNy5pI+1 unKmWhyRxQ6jJ+Lwis2BfUDxxNh0XzWw+MNNTIQU8j+0gE/eXpJpdRKqqdum45vc dTt8/44iLJco+TM7ANdMtreEpk7PisnSvsjAJasLGxDKSgwzEtClbdCGZys85SOD jds= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=mWgQ8m 1ZPQD7hb8IxDNoVrRdzYgCvDcbXNSvonDeb24=; b=Qxwrp0mfuh1ZrH3lTtOWuD cOVdGcJi097s9qCTZ2X2umV1cISaVpo47mlLfbHt+nmGRl0Rft+Nt5wLTnjLcg5L MSwjUwaPs9SOB7n+swzvzAoY4FKtN+RdIRNx7D5xz6Hq0sBwk78UGM6rSbttvH18 jLYH/3V8iVteVE0/MS1LTfcYR6e1IaXO4OvCH0tWnfe32wUiliOrQGEB+tFfXuBZ HOat9ZvhFwNnwERYoBXvmuaos+cJWojlwQwi+jGoNBnXuLSOgyyycpv2JUNk8xQa rmHGA9d+CiE/ntUfkrH2dJHrMEea53VZ1KYRpxj0pRR0tWDvIxHH9aDUR2P2vwIg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrtdefgdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefg necukfhppeejfedrudeguddruddvjedrudegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D2DA3280060; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 22:21:17 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200917022117.GA1845@jasmine.lan> References: <20200911195058.6dc013b4@scratchpost.org> <877dsw7alf.fsf@gnu.org> <20200914183037.624cc347@scratchpost.org> <87y2laactz.fsf@netris.org> <20200915230628.GA20807@jasmine.lan> <20200916141231.GA28015@jasmine.lan> <20200916165245.421e3c4c@scratchpost.org> <20200916162244.GA3262@jasmine.lan> <87363h9oab.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87363h9oab.fsf@netris.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 43344@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=NY6ozBJs; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=Qxwrp0mf; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: MhYoubaciNIB On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:36:49PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Next, it probably makes sense to test 5.8.9 with the above commit > reverted. Would someone like to try it? If that works, we can avoid > the bisection, resume kernel updates, and revert this change across all > of our kernels until a better solution is found. I'll do this tonight.