From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ALClLPanV19IKwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:49:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8LSMKPanV1+XPAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:49:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAE59402C8 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfrp-0007Kj-52 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:49:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfri-0007KL-Dv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:49:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfri-0002tK-4f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfri-000489-20 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43274: fdisk fails to build on armhf Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43274 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43274@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43274-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43274.159958009615823 (code B ref 43274); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 43274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2020 15:48:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfqx-000479-NF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:48:15 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:54080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFfqv-000472-9j for 43274@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:48:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA961D969; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rX5KNat1WlzZ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c08]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C9F0170F; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:47:53 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20200908154753.GA28320@jurong> References: <20200908111939.GA10965@jurong> <20200908120226.GA14984@jurong> <20200908131203.GA19681@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908131203.GA19681@jurong> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: IRMxTpvpM7St On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > So there does not even seem to be a test that relies on fdisk. Looking at the tests, they do call "fdisk" and "sfdisk", but these come from the util-linux package. The fdisk package only provides "gnufdisk", which does not seem to be used at all. > I would suggest to drop fdisk from this package (and getting closer to > dropping guile@1.8 as well). The package without fdisk fails on aarch64 (where it also failed previously) and on armhf (where previously its dependency fdisk failed). So I will push a commit that drops fdisk. The next step would be to check newer releases (12 and 13) of genimage. Has it actually ever been built on the arm architecture? Also, is there any opposition to then drop the fdisk package from the distribution? Andreas