From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wC5dGPEPSF+yOQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:56:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gExQFfEPSF/IOAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:56:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C0F94021E for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBO0c-00011R-H1 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:56:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNWA-0004te-6c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:25:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNW9-0000iB-Rs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:25:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNW9-0003fj-MK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43013: System reconfigure: expection reached when executing `start` on "file-system-/sys/kernel/debug" // and an unrelated "nouveau"-bug? Resent-From: raingloom Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43013 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43013@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.159855627914083 (code B ref -1); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:25:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2020 19:24:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNVn-0003f5-6n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:24:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNVk-0003ew-O2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:24:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNVk-0003lQ-Ew for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:24:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:43322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBNVh-0000gd-SF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:24:35 -0400 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bct2l1ZGxzFdqM for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:24:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1598556271; bh=tbgCGP69qF2v4QtKB2y2tbP1CioC0xsuUOiERRX1gP8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Osre/H0JjDjPSN1yxzWLoITvu0MksKhoKoCgMkAfPc85yKyepB2TjgA6IBem6AMEv gU432XHvQRJtdM0txftA+qxFMjt8mA1XZ46uBrKbOx0MmzNqbtm3bcuxUUC2kGNd2i qW+5quPGSZk4cOV2eoJdO+Xm+11Zpxf5jo2kjLsY= X-Riseup-User-ID: 1E936C1260FE8E379B68BBFBDD26EA43C97097E13EF79A2294FEC2368D80D474 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bct2k1BlBzJrj2 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:24:24 +0200 From: raingloom Message-ID: <20200827212424.41825c76@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/27 15:24:31 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Osre/H0J; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: 3d7wHS2j2Mwt On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:34:33 +0200 o.rojon@posteo.net wrote: > Hello everyone, >=20 > I'm recently running into problems updating my system. I had not=20 > reconfigured for a while (1~2 months) and now, when I reconfigure, I > get the error message below. > At first I thought it might be related to a specific guix commit, but > I have now tried four times over the course of 2 weeks, and I always > get the same error. >=20 > Strangely enough, the only reason why I noticed something is not > right is that nouveau's displaying behaviour would be weird after > updating. That is, it seems to either have changed my desktop > resolution or applied a form of magnification on all text displayed > (sddm, terminal, ...) > I have no actual clue if these two things are related to each other > AT ALL. I was just confused, because if they were totally unrelated, > I would struggle to understand why these two things happen > concurrently ;-) >=20 >=20 > While the error message is in german, I believe to have translated > the more important chunks in the Subject field. >=20 > ##### error message ##### > guix system: Bootloader erfolgreich auf =E2=80=9E/dev/sdb=E2=80=9C instal= liert > guix system: error: Ausnahme aufgetreten bei der Ausf=C3=BChrung von > =E2=80=9Estart=E2=80=9C auf Dienst =E2=80=9Efile-system-/sys/kernel/debug= =E2=80=9C: > Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern"=20 > ("none" "/sys/kernel/debug" "debugfs" () #f #f #f))'. > ####################### >=20 > As always, any help is appreciated. One good thing is that I finally=20 > learn the virtues of roll-back and switch-generation :) >=20 > Have a good day, > Olivier >=20 >=20 >=20 I have this same issue on my Thinkpad, no Nouveau. I also had issues on my AMDGPU setup. If it's related to graphics, it doesn't seem driver specific. It seems that reconfigure only fails during the build phase, not when it's actually activating the new system, because running reconfigure again causes no errors.