From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id FpFAA7veQl8GBQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:25:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CORWOrreQl/YQgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:25:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D12940145 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xUH-0004H9-8R for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:25:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xU6-0004Gu-Nm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:25:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xU6-0007j1-Eu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xU6-0001l9-CH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42983: "sudo -E guix pull" breaks ~/.config/guix/current for regular user Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42983 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 42983-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42983.15982178906743 (code B ref 42983); Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 42983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2020 21:24:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xTu-0001kh-Gu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:24:50 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:36838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k9xTs-0001kY-FY for 42983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 17:24:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-110-126-103.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.126.103]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5EEA3360EDE; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:24:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:24:43 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20200823232429.13c8c10e@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <20200822162241.GA5895@jasmine.lan> References: <20200822122750.78ddc111@scratchpost.org> <20200822162241.GA5895@jasmine.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/9WOPEHPkPB4typWphO.Ep4H"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 42983@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: k9YISMfTsFWh --Sig_/9WOPEHPkPB4typWphO.Ep4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Leo, On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 12:22:41 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > What is expected to happen in this case? Why would one want to use an > unprivileged environment with privileges to do `guix pull`, which is a > per-user operation? Paul did not know that it is a per-user operation. I did almost exactly the same thing when I was a new guix user. That's pretty much what one is used to from Debian etc. I don't really know whether it should do anything useful, but the current situation is seriously weird. --Sig_/9WOPEHPkPB4typWphO.Ep4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl9C3psACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVSOAf+OKBNZ0XnIVGeobivRJwXzEiho2NphqX72TfFHaxLBx/78UhKbrSAkUKW BwAtny/QmfXD6QDsLS1TNskn1Gqux+CTDbXCppBOprtGZFB2vb57TCy5XmyBEWvx y0/rSImsPX1bs8FxvsGaLuJLBPOONCv/zoXxKWoZXmXIGLwOgYmkuQPu+41x8fRV fxmbNYHVLZsCEKnHftiwCTlnGsZ2XPernvGhCLJnmKyeJAb6EeI2jJV17xCqcWUt IkI4AGhyaFkf1PDwnTWcz8ZOuHjVrDK3bPwMf24tXpCIgYa/Du9AI1NcuDVBoO6q i466wA2cFstfokALoFRP0EqVvl/vAg== =POZD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/9WOPEHPkPB4typWphO.Ep4H--