On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:46:34PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > If we're going to prefix "linux-libre-" to the name, which I agree is a > good idea, maybe we should add the same prefix to the other 'deblob' > script, for consistency. Also for consistency, I think the version > number should be at the end, after "deblob-check", as is the case for > the other deblob script. > > There's also the question of whether the micro version number should be > included in the file name. In practice, these deblob scripts almost > never change from one micro version to the next. Also, I suspect > (although I've not yet confirmed it) that these deblob scripts likely > work for older kernels in the same stable series. > > For those reasons, at present the micro version number appears only in > the URLs, and not in either the file names or in the version number as > recorded in the first element of the triplet returned by > 'linux-libre-deblob-scripts'. I'd personally be inclined to keep it > that way, although I don't feel strongly about it. Good ideas. I've taken them into account on my local branch while I test building the final tarballs. I'll push to the kernel-updates branch once I am satisfied with the result. Thanks for your feedback!