From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EKbbE4638F6QIgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id SOihD4638F7RZwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB7E9404C3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMrq-0002Rr-Dl for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMri-0002Q8-KF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMri-0006zu-B4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMri-000811-9u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42002: Bug: Signal kill during build Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42002 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 42002-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42002.159283391730800 (code B ref 42002); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 42002) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2020 13:51:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMrc-00080g-M1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:56 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:57491) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnMrZ-00080Q-Av for 42002@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:54 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8FD5C2989; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=vIIbsC850UU5TUgyQimCURph /w5kYCvH4I3a+Fiqd7Y=; b=O6EBoCjGHPTSOs5T+90wNHkKl9QpwObMJNUUajsO wd1Y8XEgoeK7nqbCeHu0JNdKG7KQDt9J5h93PEJHBVCGOQfdtXf+k7R6WKSlQx/D V7QXbclzH7BVBmvmFhiAgVqoBMeCeIjoQ/1hoO11vifFiexhYNAY6D8f3NVjFJ2K uoc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=vIIbsC 850UU5TUgyQimCURph/w5kYCvH4I3a+Fiqd7Y=; b=cqk0L+KqKqWoddYd/HSsH5 StwWejiLqHXXvWlAo5/7QxkATEQHM6RMdPu/kU+YlsZ/OdTEV0okYaNwpXE7v9ZX 3CMJzEfKSwrd3I0u7vEexvd00w//heUHe/iA3/Y77OP77ldF1EoUowhZJneiyWom Ub3WeMfOLWbsYWraYwcR8HCpVTtrq1EDV6HllwEVQ+swfs29ZiRfm4UbyTWPzW1P P7P25VdTF08IcO5/i9YMMZDvOwOmWXVr9f/NTcE/pmKZfMqMDVh1S1uX9cfgmCeZ u/sIuNyoEaYyFrh9vvzmq91CtmWAdaRs7lFG7rIEaWHN9J7MMlDWGz+QDKEpFwow == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekvddgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvveegkeduiedvieeludevkeeugfeuueelhedtffegffdtfeekveelffeufedu keenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddufeekrdeife enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvgho sehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 78CDF328006F; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:51:44 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200622135144.GA9358@jasmine.lan> References: <20200622124708.GC22974@E5400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200622124708.GC22974@E5400> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9on?= Lain Delysid , 42002@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=O6EBoCjG; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=cqk0L+Kq; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.11 X-TUID: 2RQE8DNwWDAT --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:47:08PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > The signal 9 (killed) makes me think a C++ program killed. I checked > wikipedia and it says the Banana Pi M3 has 2GB of RAM. Was there > anything else running at the time? 'guix pull' can be resource > intensive, especially on lower powered machines. I think it should be possible with 2GB of RAM, if you limit the number of concurrent builds. For example, something like `guix pull --max-jobs=1`. And I think the memory requirements should decrease with the recently released Guile 3.0.3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2020-06/msg00008.html --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl7wt2YACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi1Yw/8CEL2qWfcbFTZbQeAXINtLx9AxW34o/SNOaub9vK7rMynR1eWffO/CmGx d/ktrh4RVV22LqYyiaVT1YG3T8AKz1hZvk72KE6m+cE1988ZsH4Pz6E2fHnvHPf/ Sf3STDVYxZH8MoRTZSTnSYxLAdhL3DB86BNLcvhynEw+DMMS25iMUtyqAlmBgErL DlAQ1KjW5nj13PWv5WtAhlYN2lRVENusDqO4zpFz9xYU0CRWKGCpPYlSK6nkKgKa EvO/HMkZqC1HSPyiYoQdbKb4NnYR51MR+qKxt/EQDEWS8w7UF4/e2YB7x8DZiedo MSvhH+dSjnd1zOjqGv/1zz6GdwzC3J7KYtzVNFcMEYABXeFT9LXMwXAcdev3pz2G lnkIRB9ApSAJFK6OZ4jR5oLw69X3JE/DrK9VKGOMG4KUn/0kJS+h4ljsMz1KJuKs 4AYXLOC9uui6zPa4QwVeyGUyu2VGuxj5UWzpbigjZnhwIURomS4zTGJsz0S6m9Kk fSrctVewMA8gilMvID3znbhcZ57uv+M5Lda+p3k5ev5X1lEj3kn882Dwo3rwJgxK bcMajQzLA1Af4rEXi7U2oQNpxlHZwAG4PCkrGhaQGB9cXeufl3ZazClqs/GKHJwB PBhAwP0MfuOq3cGhQmYYF5SpcfLjuiO4Y7GBKpc6X5LvWqumjgE= =q2OY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--