From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UD5+B/yO1l6dXAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:40:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id GKU6A/yO1l6ZTQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:40:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A732940276 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAtW-0001Xf-2H for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:40:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAtO-0001XU-JT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:40:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAtO-0006Yq-9k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAtO-0003Hw-6L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40406: python-matplotlib fails to build on i686-linux Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40406 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Diego Nicola Barbato Received: via spool by 40406-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40406.159111956512593 (code B ref 40406); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 40406) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2020 17:39:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAsn-0003H3-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:39:25 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:59119) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgAsm-0003Gq-12 for 40406@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:39:24 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91735C00EE; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:39:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:39:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=u1tOHg5xXtEcRdb6uuhQDRl/ H7/uiIdrOgOBw5XH9L4=; b=jtyg67W0rg4MxKYhrK6/r/gpEApos4nQdil0t1+4 Nf2wkyhx2KqrMX77GU1LDyLwA6El8SP7eU5ZKbgB2cuDLKMvwRPVJANCH/HOUSGC DyuPqUcxqblctQHkrhjDQ5aIj6sp8RjmXV7g+x9RKUxmWSYQ2uC71HlsknTZxjDR epc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=u1tOHg 5xXtEcRdb6uuhQDRl/H7/uiIdrOgOBw5XH9L4=; b=3d9KPAHk/j75Dvowf5oqbN XSvGeDjw5jnaj8Njmx8466VVA5Q6NV/BaYQnzxaZKk8bgEku0pOttXxO9uF6pAFy KKmENC9Ys4gR1DZGI48o7WP7iV+Ej/Z/sr180tTQJnanc605tr//a/i3Zw9oz6HY ePDN3kVJhoEOAiJD3amlkslSzRDfjztvowwUOh3wdByy1RQ05vKHw1DWj+iGDXHk KgenUmkbahDRAIGPvIpcm0pgfXLCw0lXLCh8xzndDD9RhAWbeI9+XgkPvUWJN+Fk skuBzWhRQvzAzr1sz/U0iDeJjgy+0WWGF5W+1eJ8T2JNArHv8bVaxdf//oWK8MkA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudefjedgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddufeekrdeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66A653280059; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:39:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:39:16 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200602173916.GB19317@jasmine.lan> References: <87mu7s1tqv.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <20200403161802.GA3560@jasmine.lan> <878sh5a1bf.fsf@GlaDOS.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878sh5a1bf.fsf@GlaDOS.home> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 40406@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=jtyg67W0; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=3d9KPAHk; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: GAey1kg59aiN On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 06:18:28PM +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: > I was opposed to this at first (after all, if upstream supports Numpy on > i686, why shouldn't we?), but after seeing that even simple things like > matrix multiplication can produce incorrect results I'm in favour of > limiting it to contemporary architectures. What do others think? I'll leave it up to you and others who are actually using these programs. I do think it's unlikely the upstream developers use or test the software on i686, or on anything besides x86_64.