From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AI4WKWtP0V7HIgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:07:39 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id uIDKJGtP0V6jPQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:07:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659049403EC for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejPs-0000Fi-HE for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:07:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejNO-0006rn-UR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:05:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejNO-0007Sg-IR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jejNO-0002UY-CU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41602: texlive-texmf is actually subtitutable Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41602 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 41602-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41602.15907754609519 (code B ref 41602); Fri, 29 May 2020 18:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 41602) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2020 18:04:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jejMh-0002TO-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:19 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jejMh-0002TA-2O for 41602@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:19 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001235C00E2; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=xeoM+eLb7CQjW2kVqqKxKv43x4XNpQIuhwL4bF8J44U=; b=ytw7i7CNZfax KpCJMiuSFXI7tK2/yHjLIZVZQBs/ZRv83mf5iPeVptWA/pRzzL2NzLbtILsUZXnb T3fK0tctr2PFOCTNs8y3yMpoyveOqPLuC+kXf3RsyVtOt0oDSP3+fSmOZZvKrS4o YV2yx5wjNTsPhwdfDGcr/FlCITioL2k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xeoM+eLb7CQjW2kVqqKxKv43x4XNpQIuhwL4bF8J4 4U=; b=nG68dd0+UfSbhBdMtBkCN2eT1Ff8VY+tM1PgJJwQIa8ZBf7KDxgf150DQ zOIr60A7DYvcMytcBprrYs2Jj7NaAt0dIra2oFnaYEf6govVEVgKD1tiigdnMvuv Pc7QvVDeG5mhBt1bO+guVXNQBANWjyOKI+zaWg0WvamB5O7VXzArUUHW5EgmO9Ee /B7Qiok+HxwQpADmcQ4YYo8SIOI+CxVyf7M6bQNxvwTQbWUtRbvJoPAG0OpwGfSN pGrxuAiMoEbecBqgAWYH9/e0DBx5uNt//QT/Gi70mqKcpE+Estq/FM9ni9B/+a7d xQSJsXylpAUtSMb+bdDtzr4N7FCww== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvkedgleeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeejgeeghedtudfgffdutddvffefffejkeffffevffehgedvvdeutdffkeej jeejnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7081F306215A; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:04:11 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200529180411.GB3754@jasmine.lan> References: <878sha3h7n.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <878sha3h7n.fsf@inria.fr> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41602@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=ytw7i7CN; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=nG68dd0+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 11zPNvq012KA On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 05:15:40PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The info suggests it won’t be substituted, but it’s eventually > substituted. I wonder why, because the .drv has: > > ("allowSubstitutes","0") > > and the daemon has: > > bool substitutesAllowed(const Derivation & drv) > { > return get(drv.env, "allowSubstitutes", "1") == "1"; > } > > and: > > if (settings.useSubstitutes && substitutesAllowed(drv)) > foreach (PathSet::iterator, i, invalidOutputs) > addWaitee(worker.makeSubstitutionGoal(*i, buildMode == bmRepair)); > > Thoughts? I wonder if the content-addressed fallbacks take a different code path that doesn't respect "allowSubstitutes"?