From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +Hz2LwFDzV6GeQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 16:25:37 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QFzTKwFDzV5fSAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 16:25:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77F2940B2B for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 16:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46042 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcOU-0006kv-Dl for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:25:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcNy-0006MA-Q6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcNy-0000rG-G8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcNy-0006rB-CR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?) Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41406 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Danny Milosavljevic Received: via spool by 41406-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41406.159051028526323 (code B ref 41406); Tue, 26 May 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 41406) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2020 16:24:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcNh-0006qV-4Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:45 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:46635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdcNZ-0006qD-Uz for 41406@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:43 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775395C010F; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=m/fg2TMGZWI/vifPFOCI4DaJ dFiyGlWPApdylDT7LnM=; b=1Z8P9mHWwDHVQ387a5E88zYFxvqkD8lULiJdk2tA iBJP1n88ZLnCOeHxq2leM7/tPH6KmWyFRCVoIiynip7QJLWWudM3uh3VwMQWzZEX ukoPMTe6E+1kAAJZFdcVOlpIIyHHBjdig+h50k+Pdv4Ujmt7yjxHWAq4k4ogTLWB 5j4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=m/fg2T MGZWI/vifPFOCI4DaJdFiyGlWPApdylDT7LnM=; b=zgaCEi3NhHiNY1KlTQKQfY nRHQ1nk5D2c5iwtqUqnXQ0Qoexc5qcXLegDbf6x48HcZ2Wes4FLNCAoMaCjBSBay bCgOwkP+g2Y5HUevaEM3BqwbyvYxTm2KFD42CB/wxPf33TMG3muWViFJtKWjggQn OYSdMThl7StAQ0X74TGTavPq4iVOC0GkiFg4Q1UiP6TpcLByjkUoSDiurQ4BLIk6 jiZrY8feveZmtDIdnva5mscmOsqT5z4KiRwjONb1wgtOLncqz5tvGigP6zZhpqZW 3MDUBfYp29IjbGsvJTowlbsaFonm+9mPVv57gwx178ht7+8O2v2HhscGFlhEqLrA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvvddgleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddufeekrdeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6C943280060; Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:24:22 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200526162422.GA21828@jasmine.lan> References: <20200519172740.GA3947@jasmine.lan> <20200519201641.0bc4b2d4@scratchpost.org> <20200519182523.GA8397@jasmine.lan> <20200519203234.0bf5acd1@scratchpost.org> <875zcryvun.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200520164316.GA21201@jasmine.lan> <20200521162009.GA25215@jasmine.lan> <20200526161701.6546551c@scratchpost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200526161701.6546551c@scratchpost.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41406@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=1Z8P9mHW; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=zgaCEi3N; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: VxUaMmrJMT/E On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:17:01PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 12:20:09 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > We should make the linter complain about this [go] reference. > > What do you mean exactly? How would it know, given that that was a runtime > dependency? Would guix lint build the derivation and check for references > to go etc? Sounds doable. I had confused this sitation with the linter's warnings about "inputs that should be native". It's probably not worth adding a linter check for this, because everyone should be using the go-build-system for their Go packages, and if it doesn't work, that's a bug in the build system, not in the package definition :) I don't think the linter should build things and check for spurious references. At least, not just for this case.