From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AB4RJjmCuV6sEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id iBgqJkeCuV5aSQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAD1940068 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57278 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBd6-0004Ru-Ga for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:50:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBcw-0004Po-40 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:50:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBcv-0004lO-Pd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:50:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBcv-00015J-Ln for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41132: [core-updates]: Fonts not working on foreign distro (Debian) Resent-From: Bengt Richter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41132 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 41132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41132.15892157714126 (code B ref 41132); Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 41132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 16:49:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBcR-00014U-EB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:49:31 -0400 Received: from imta-35.everyone.net ([216.200.145.35]:46464 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYBcP-00014N-Vi for 41132@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:49:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0004961.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04BGdipF021193; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:49:28 -0700 X-Eon-Originating-Account: tvcktHyUCArvpxT7bVXW99OLceYwxYU8XU8bHMVy69o X-Eon-Dm: m0116952.ppops.net Received: by m0116952.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 5a81dcdb) id m0116952.5e67f932.6e0e53; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:49:27 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJeuYIXQLPM1QIAAAAD,0c2ad7354129b1bbf70afd6c81b6477e X-Eip: 9LIpDxgjnmN_3XIhhYQ8V5VkKwG5OkKdsHkcVVW46s4 Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:49:10 +0200 From: Bengt Richter Message-ID: <20200511164910.GA5379@LionPure> References: <20200508005501.GA5555@jasmine.lan> <87mu6i3ipp.fsf@devup.no> <20200508180851.GA11754@jasmine.lan> <20200508221846.GA3220@LionPure> <20200508225241.GA6953@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200508225241.GA6953@jasmine.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-11_08:2020-05-11, 2020-05-11 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2005110132 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: 41132@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.51 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.51 / 13.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[bokr@bokr.com]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.54014356452887]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.07), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bokr@bokr.com,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bokr.com]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: VcLpyqJGTCvC Hi Leo, On +2020-05-08 18:52:41 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Bengt Richter wrote: > > Didn't I just see a permissions-related bug reminiscent of this go by a short while ago? > > Could it be related? Do the dir/file perms look normal? > > Upthread, Tobias pointed out that fc-cache didn't have permissions for > /var/cache/fontconfig, but deleting that didn't seem to make a > difference. Could that be what you were thinking about? No, I think it was about a deferred build action created as root and bits needed for later phase or context, as non-root, were inaccessible. Sorry for the noise. -- Regards, Bengt Richter