From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6BWoIrCgtV5YJAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 18:10:56 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4CN7Er2gtV7ZZAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 18:11:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2839400F4 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 18:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Sk-00049i-Al for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:11:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Ri-0002tR-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:10:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Rh-0005LQ-UJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:10:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Rh-0000TZ-OH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41132: [core-updates]: Fonts not working on foreign distro (Debian) Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 18:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41132 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Marius Bakke Received: via spool by 41132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41132.15889613521753 (code B ref 41132); Fri, 08 May 2020 18:10:01 +0000 Received: (at 41132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2020 18:09:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Qk-0000S4-HU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:09:12 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:53357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jX7Qi-0000RP-9c for 41132@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 14:09:00 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED5062D; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:08:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 May 2020 14:08:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=kdx31S4qkrXgHIlnhZC3klF6 VlJpNc+fTZAEuH4PZuk=; b=pdlxC2DoUl5kLo24Apd6G/mY1zUVbXU3o2cSXdUL KuCeaESjHwNO1JQRi3OB0Ep4PA2Xim474E872eX4itxwsbPNwxHhb0IxtB0VUMJY ocqy40zVL21mtORs5ZjiWeR5kOp3jbGb120vVUruNc3jFFOlAd330GKBkCoeuohF XGo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kdx31S 4qkrXgHIlnhZC3klF6VlJpNc+fTZAEuH4PZuk=; b=lze0Nfcl6ZrynHJ9/SZnd8 JzY+jGBUto8eYIHXvfhO19yh7NeEHpIL0vGNTjFjpdHTdIrksa1ScIznb1/hUqnA K0ozhwA/9um1pGB8OpHwLV3euWYDa6rDa/vs+O4m/CPQj4MDu2mVx0yiuUQN455J zO0XzHLt1RxVz/T0Hp7IpOQcMInyHbJAIjU0W7131C61p6m9HIqcVj9ajDotX/sm sSQB2VJc/4cY+zlOypPVAWCWW+C+OvHAnHB/x5gvz73VwSbe5WEvebkqbOLOtER4 N14ROQNo/f3Jiu68UQj5f2euapC4o9n4kKDE9WYPyWmDZktlB34spOirjGbvGO7A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrkeefgdehhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeegheekjedtleetjedvudffhffgfeffueekvdeufedtvedvvedtteeftddujedv necuffhomhgrihhnpehlvghordhlohgtrghlnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrie efnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgv ohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4C862306620E; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:08:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 14:08:51 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200508180851.GA11754@jasmine.lan> References: <20200508005501.GA5555@jasmine.lan> <87mu6i3ipp.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mu6i3ipp.fsf@devup.no> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41132@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -2.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=pdlxC2Do; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=lze0Nfcl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.54033956565424]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.10), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[famulari.name:s=mesmtp,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[famulari.name:-,messagingengine.com:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[fastmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[76.124.138.63:received]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[leo@famulari.name,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[famulari.name]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: etX22/0si85O --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Just to be clear, these programs are able to find fonts you have > installed through Guix, right? They can find the font packages I install with Guix, but not the hard-coded PostScript fonts. > > The specific fonts in question are the URW fonts, aka the "PostScript > > fonts", provided by Debian's gsfonts and gsfonts-x11 packages. >=20 > Are those the only affected fonts? I looked more closely, and Guix applications can no longer see *any* fonts from Debian. > > $ fc-cache -rv >=20 > [...] >=20 > > /home/leo/.local/share/fonts: caching, new cache contents: 0 fonts, 0 d= irs > > /home/leo/.local/share/fonts: failed to write cache >=20 > [...] >=20 > > /home/leo/.fonts: caching, new cache contents: 0 fonts, 0 dirs > > /home/leo/.fonts: failed to write cache >=20 > [...] >=20 > > fc-cache: failed >=20 > FWIW the new fc-cache fails for me on Guix System too if I create these > empty directories. Confirmed. fc-cache exited successfully when I removed those directories. > Can you inspect 'fc-list ' with the new and old fontconfig? Are there > differences? The only differences, after running `fc-cache -rfv`, are the differing store paths of the hard-coded gs-fonts package. Another thing I noticed is that I can do `fc-cache -rfv /usr/share/fonts && fc-list`, and the hundreds of fonts found in that directory are *not shown* in fc-list, but that's the same as on the master branch. So, I'm still not sure what the difference is. --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl61oDAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwggpBAArzvWSoalJ+bfL5Fnr7391Nlwx5fLjqtJwf9JCrGYRt72Kv4STzh4/l9v W83Pfgf5yegndaeNV7B6UtrRZSHdCAI/3ZmPduzLx+kV43+9NUJ2YMpXOJatsmLl 3+qeoa1Ej4pTYouhp4MOjmsPGPVgETcNSxiUy135WqSJGGmOT+h0vvnsmzmQEHu5 p2KJENssIIww1INKs5kJ9dOliYErWf+2p89AAP5XMibQWchrYcItManufyXzRffq lkBbrnaj9WpvINWY7qEvf0eKBR303ihxwRsC72ztSxVZd1IFkN0vbJjrDZ9E3fHk 4CUiQxBaKogqBDhtO0evyONbG4bNImfPYMrA/9KajTd7JKe+StjGcg1k3Y2Hu6zm LivTwLjs4+w0YPft2L3Db9VpASskwu5VOjmuje6alb+eu7UoQQqjS3TE5l9ONXi1 9+EkTrNBlwlDZP20BXJLugwgrcezkHada1SFpzCsI/+kkVukCuUJbCaLagXiDOVQ zoKxmiVMCotY8b7NKD8NWcz00V4RiYH6SounCu29ZmkzZFcbJAS6+VxVHMIucABX 6Y7skqz39swLFZj/kuLwJwMtBCAYJdkck/W+PpNKN7WbcXdz6p1W0nKrm/Mc4MkS n9AdjPlB7OxmmxvMimeLPKOFXBMoN+2/JuPiUdHQFo+KfBlT9no= =kRg9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--