From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MOmMHZzkq16uEQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:58:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GJaeEqXkq16KRAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:58:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49346943AF9 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 08:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jURUq-0004Gr-B3 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:58:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jURUi-0004FK-Cc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:58:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jURUh-0008FT-Oi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:58:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jURUh-0008Ey-BN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jURUg-0006SZ-Ar for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#35574: bcm5974 touchpad is not recognized as touchpad Resent-From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 08:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35574 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Brice Waegeneire Received: via spool by 35574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35574.158832344524775 (code B ref 35574); Fri, 01 May 2020 08:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 35574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2020 08:57:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jURU5-0006RX-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:57:25 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:58476 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jURU3-0006RP-0Z for 35574@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 04:57:23 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F97F36055C; Fri, 1 May 2020 10:57:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1588323441; bh=ztb3jrH6NIPR7xTEWVD+EJ/zO7izOv7BBaTzLixxcI8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=G1ui0zvMQL36IQB9r80KHOPI2rn/8PcJbzGP0lE/UfTfQE+DXKfqjjVObL5ZIzfuT djNl1zNu7oNFmrCW+KURCn/iS5sO4jej1Xy56e0vcZhMYcRCIoV14zzaVpVNVyMjXj G43jtJW+AhqM9J7P2UnjxHubaHj5C4Per+5yqUX4= Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 10:57:19 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <20200501085719.b2ewxlbgtcl2lhxw@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20200427002857.apq5nreio5kllpoq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87pnbtwi2y.fsf@gmail.com> <20200428094502.cduna7cyerl77ouq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200429152736.xocwatxukviul3bl@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87zhauwbdx.fsf@gmail.com> <20200429164120.fousoswocdgsralr@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200429164247.xvipdobeutvvhron@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87h7x2ywgw.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 35574@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=G1ui0zvM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49501509028276]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.16), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[pelzflorian.de:s=mail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[pelzflorian.de:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[willemp.be:url]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pelzflorian.de]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: ZPfGV1uVV9p4 On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 06:46:51PM +0000, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > LGTM! I wonder if, as Ubuntu, we should also blacklist “usbkbd” the > counterpart of “usbmouse” or just to wait a bug report about it - if > it ever happen. I will add usbkbd to the blacklist because claims there is a race with the usbhid module and the Linux kernel documentation says usbhid has more features and “Use usbhid instead if there isn’t any special reason to use this.” Thank you! Regards, Florian