* bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native @ 2020-04-09 21:24 Marius Bakke 2020-04-09 21:31 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Marius Bakke @ 2020-04-09 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 40528 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 107 bytes --] 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of a package, not propagated-inputs. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native 2020-04-09 21:24 bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native Marius Bakke @ 2020-04-09 21:31 ` Efraim Flashner 2020-04-09 21:42 ` Marius Bakke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2020-04-09 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marius Bakke; +Cc: 40528 [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --] On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of > a package, not propagated-inputs. The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them? gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' should probably be a native input -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-lint-Check-for-inappropriate-inputs-in-propagated-in.patch --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --] From 2ca0a385847c8dfcaffe4f32c5dbce7297086859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:29:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] lint: Check for inappropriate inputs in propagated-inputs too. * guix/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-native): Also check the propagated inputs of the package. --- guix/lint.scm | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm index 72582cfffb..bda5c0cd77 100644 --- a/guix/lint.scm +++ b/guix/lint.scm @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2016 Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> -;;; Copyright © 2017, 2018 Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> +;;; Copyright © 2017, 2018, 2020 Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ;;; Copyright © 2018, 2019 Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. @@ -286,7 +286,8 @@ of a package, and INPUT-NAMES, a list of package specifications such as (define (check-inputs-should-be-native package) ;; Emit a warning if some inputs of PACKAGE are likely to belong to its ;; native inputs. - (let ((inputs (package-inputs package)) + (let ((inputs (append (package-inputs package) + (package-propagated-inputs package))) (input-names '("pkg-config" "autoconf" -- 2.26.0 [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native 2020-04-09 21:31 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2020-04-09 21:42 ` Marius Bakke 2020-04-09 21:50 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Marius Bakke @ 2020-04-09 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: 40528 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 649 bytes --] Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of >> a package, not propagated-inputs. > > The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of > inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them? Wow, that was incredibly fast! > gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' should probably be a native input I'm inclined to leave it. I think many of these plugin packages should not be propagating the package that they plug into anyway. LGTM! [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native 2020-04-09 21:42 ` Marius Bakke @ 2020-04-09 21:50 ` Efraim Flashner 2020-04-10 8:51 ` Christopher Baines 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2020-04-09 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marius Bakke; +Cc: 40528-done [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 997 bytes --] On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of > >> a package, not propagated-inputs. > > > > The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of > > inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them? > > Wow, that was incredibly fast! > > > gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' should probably be a native input > > I'm inclined to leave it. I think many of these plugin packages should > not be propagating the package that they plug into anyway. > > LGTM! OK, patch pushed. -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native 2020-04-09 21:50 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2020-04-10 8:51 ` Christopher Baines 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Christopher Baines @ 2020-04-10 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marius Bakke, 40528-done [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --] Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of >> >> a package, not propagated-inputs. >> > >> > The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of >> > inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them? >> >> Wow, that was incredibly fast! >> >> > gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' should probably be a native input >> >> I'm inclined to leave it. I think many of these plugin packages should >> not be propagating the package that they plug into anyway. >> >> LGTM! > > OK, patch pushed. Looks like it's working :) [1] 1: http://data.guix.gnu.org/compare?base_commit=960abd585940c33744040c79e2a37e588d36e589&target_commit=d95252baf97adb261dd823d4e7a74a7522815c1c [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-10 8:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-09 21:24 bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native Marius Bakke 2020-04-09 21:31 ` Efraim Flashner 2020-04-09 21:42 ` Marius Bakke 2020-04-09 21:50 ` Efraim Flashner 2020-04-10 8:51 ` Christopher Baines
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).