From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#40022: Build Error in volk-1.3 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:52:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20200311075208.GE26542@E5400> References: <87a74nit6j.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBwAp-0006Jy-H6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:53:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBwAo-0002I9-Ew for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBwAo-0002HW-AU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBwAo-000357-85 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a74nit6j.fsf@nckx> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: mgorlick@acm.org, 40022@debbugs.gnu.org --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:20:04AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug rep= orts for GNU Guix wrote: > Michael Gorlick =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > Build log attached. >=20 > Thanks. This looks like . >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R I didn't look at the bug report, but my older machine (from around 2010) was able to build it, but newer, more powerful machines were not, with the same error as you got. Is the 2.x series compatible with the 1.x series? I see we have 1.3 and 1.4 is about 2 years old, while 2.3 was released last month. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5omKUACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1E8+w/+P38b8e4HCnWBVB8MChP0x3Tf3zZr6okedy2B5kDu774DumaVSBjL5XbE vQDp9VfBMD2h9KcGz+D3emFb2O8yj6W6vKHjY7U6eCIAwq7y3efx/vE9JHKBqtSA /kboohDreWETL7q2vICna7PkjjOEnUXdMgxRytstYXyXSQO/PsxrXVyrS6+X0GRJ Tw3xq5LjW/8IqNbe6AfhDIQZViSZyEgOwrYO/Gzp3UP41jTg0GKFCjWNT/57I262 9P9cR3Qoqz0llZzYGjMb4TW4p1N3smB+tCKC5GLx4BvWtrXZr6toUKoK+8+N8dhG zGOdGKRhPAabxJeyh7+WUUU1FITdP216ZVWuzbWsP+NpL9ut9pvnCCoQGpin49MY HLEnok74KX8/eMPbjzc9xW1X/UFa5ybOO2/3Q10KU12ZjaBp3+akVo3kYRBSWAiB eXIsgO1dbwXFMM1jM0FFz75MuB7WesNBOC2JK1hwX0iU37CZpbfZD9/9wGh8Shcx ZrPse9OLmcgAU9r2tstFUisJB2CYgPVz76tVSNtU5xSvEhaDjPEUwnU+4znkPA+8 94Kxt/pwuj3q+6RuWz70vLkVSOcDbYwtAoyVYJEujWytbfNNpnBUwU8W5vM+3drQ bfnWiZvgublQ2Vl7UkRtHLVkAYPiwL1dDTRyx2OxSv5c4hmhR2A= =a0lC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS--