From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Subject: bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:19:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20200310071901.GB2917@zpidnp36> References: <20200305133318.GB2909@zpidnp36> <87ftem7m6d.fsf@gnu.org> <20200306074018.GC2909@zpidnp36> <87wo7xoiuj.fsf@gnu.org> <20200306114548.GD2909@zpidnp36> <87zhcraxce.fsf@gnu.org> <20200309082253.GA2917@zpidnp36> <87fteh3iwv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBZBL-0004Hq-CR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBZBK-0005uM-6I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBZBK-0005tr-2j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBZBJ-0000Az-Sd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:20:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fteh3iwv.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 39925@debbugs.gnu.org --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Ludo, > For #2, we would need to do something like Jakub did in (guix scripts > system reconfigure), where the effectul bits can be transparently > evaluated either locally or remotely. I don=E2=80=99t understand why #2 needs different mechanics. As I said, /va= r/guix is mounted r/w on every machine and in fact `guix package -i` is working as intended. Maybe we=E2=80=99ve got a communication issue here and we=E2=80=99re talkin= g about two different things? Lars --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEyk+M9DfXR4/aBV/UQhN3ARo3hEYFAl5nP2AACgkQQhN3ARo3 hEYi6Av9GrViMbCfYgg1SrfWDEqoq2ZMTB03BImComFuK+68seyIiOAf0SDtMRyY d281X3fDq2XlYAjgo6J7V1uaHoniDdt6G3RMlP2dD+P39yiv1xxo83v2Ytd7uq/Y RJHL/lkFT1dKaXs8cLNib870Nco0muVf9gErjptgsmcqnLYjHKseDwG/1p2f7JSA LtHPXiCP6xRQxOBrY37D3ChshXAQycZWVdNdndMeRyFKuUeuxGGjwwt/UUB3+uYX 385F1zZvDG25SLeJDwoxLurExfmMLw9UOu3U4e03jfyxC0+Rany6fMxcz+IItO8g VTJxUOr0jaXfOJjAKXDQOFFQm7/SvbhOw6t6Ruk2xWAEid8TJchglbcomJ5P0EW/ htd4819dabmTQsXu3dtiB/FtDAIpyKSVXqdpRud/deicObLq75ublwP4vh5PWBYa CacIrvLr03y2e0YSUzm+MtZN1ra3amevGcWvP001waT8Kdbt9Fv05aQw2jKQX2bW S1C2y9E3 =thRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw--