From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Subject: bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:45:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20200306114548.GD2909@zpidnp36> References: <20200305133318.GB2909@zpidnp36> <87ftem7m6d.fsf@gnu.org> <20200306074018.GC2909@zpidnp36> <87wo7xoiuj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jABQb-0004X9-15 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:46:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jABQY-0000v2-R1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:46:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jABQY-0000tE-1I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:46:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jABQX-0000av-T2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:46:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wo7xoiuj.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 39925@debbugs.gnu.org --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > Sounds like this ssh URI is not valid on the nodes, is that right? I would consider it valid, since `ssh master.` and `guix build ` both work just fine from the nodes. It=E2=80=99s just `guix pull= `, which is causing issues. > Right. So perhaps I don=E2=80=99t quite understand the use case. What a= bout > simply pulling from one of these machines, if everything is shared over > NFS? Sure, that=E2=80=99s an option, but anyone who tries will get a strange err= or message. And it breaks the appeal of having a remote guix daemon in the first place, that is being able to run `guix ` on any machine I log into. If t= hat is not the case (i.e. not for `guix pull`) it would be more consistent to a= sk users to SSH into a different machine every time they interact with guix. D= oes that explain my use case? Lars --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEyk+M9DfXR4/aBV/UQhN3ARo3hEYFAl5iN+YACgkQQhN3ARo3 hEYgiAv/cY2qHPkhZiV8IfcewbnLgKQaS6+BotFrsQYDt9ZISYcHGcSgWymCoGBY nqZllY9lBedxntAW4t4hNox5nfg2UY5oJ3Sqk7BFP4lmbrIAm7AUIjaVN+FCWtSz Gn0S66F90H8BTSya4DcjHZA2OQ7f+QzhJPRZqjVhUkAzkklteE251XeaA9ZRnzFY vaPkiQrCFPzHiaiDtthKLpcHCzr2TR1ucr8OboChtv2FhuorYBMvc7n9njyWIMDr mWy4ixmZp6MG/R3EmC8nE4E/9/0WGhV3EA+7Yq2ICpBmYrDv0AXRW5RqxV2TgG0L I6VTwY5MDA+zD00Rdswv463AWPwjkEzoppucjZX+Nl6lG7h11J3UZhd4VsSqli41 g0WEO98LT86Zf6TFn1VzioUZxwRBmhekd7E/PTaYJxkDxtBzD4CCVKCl4Vh0K/j+ BfdsNzgx0O0Idwa2QogrrZZqHNLjuuNRVDHshn7Atb6TyvOeR2LlOsU8TvYOqprv zzQbfiZn =JCnG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j--