From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#38167: guix pull takes over 8 GiB of memory to finish if there are no substitutes Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:44:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20191231164450.26450360@scratchpost.org> References: <20191111080635.14f7b39a@scratchpost.org> <87eeyec18l.fsf@cbaines.net> <878somno0f.fsf@gnu.org> <20191226204555.1abe4d21@scratchpost.org> <20191226204828.239470dd@scratchpost.org> <871rsphc5f.fsf@gnu.org> <20191228120128.010d72ee@scratchpost.org> <877e2gbiyv.fsf@gnu.org> <20191228185550.1f2ac413@scratchpost.org> <87fth292l5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/2282tP6UBau1oQP.pCizt/W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imJhe-0001m3-UW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:45:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imJhd-0005wJ-RG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:45:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imJhd-0005v8-Mx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:45:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imJhd-0002RH-KF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:45:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87fth292l5.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 38167@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/2282tP6UBau1oQP.pCizt/W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 23:41:42 +0100 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > It could be because my modules in GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH contain an import c= ycle > > (I don't know whether it does, but I had such a cycle before). =20 >=20 > And that=E2=80=99s definitely a possibility! Can you try unsetting > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH? Sure, but that will not decide it conclusively. It's pretty rare that guix pull has the problem above (once a week or so), = so it could also be that it will work because it got a non-problematic case the same time (but not because of) I unset GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. --Sig_/2282tP6UBau1oQP.pCizt/W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl4LbPIACgkQ5xo1VCww uqXLywf/c0le+ba/pmCHGrRKffj0ejFC9Ya7L+aNLF/c2ucyFsqJUOw5NRMAmFy5 Fryr2ZXbpHT1Ld+vEJg+R9woP4DEx0CAjhUQwr1tjmMr+FoKRx8SVYPf7wbAytDj wCj+XRuazgjFA/QuGO0O8hv32ooIz+jxoGvbyHfveXedocJ6iud5yZ8ahYwBNSBK OiESC5wI2ZGSbwL5lMUQ+ae+rH/CAEAtWIFQeRPpx5iqmHYMIM1fTNxmytol4074 2SWL+YJsXQBrV9aauRd45iQkR/Yj3BVDI/oayan70wPGpEFEr8epUSeVAx2M6Q0u gR3qx+CEIuRTlTmHIDRtqRCcZ15dhw== =1QAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2282tP6UBau1oQP.pCizt/W--