From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: bug#36931: guile-bash repository no longer exists? Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20190826132009.09cef7e4@alma-ubu> References: <05b9dc182cdcbe72ddea77191681258380a672a4.camel@gmail.com> <87ftmfznhs.fsf@elephly.net> <20190805223907.5ead2297@alma-ubu> <87d0gv4zbt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/t4ENrkTi+Owjxj_j+lP+KQY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2D3X-0002A2-AA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:21:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2D3W-0001wW-BJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:21:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2D3W-0001wS-80 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2D3W-0002Vt-2q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:21:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d0gv4zbt.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36931@debbugs.gnu.org, Jesse Gibbons --Sig_/t4ENrkTi+Owjxj_j+lP+KQY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:32:38 +0200 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Ouch. I=E2=80=99ve improved error reporting handling here, but I think t= he > fundamental issue is that SWH is failing to deliver this thing, even > though it does have it: Thanks for looking into this. Let's see what SWH has to say. After all, I think we should leave this pack in Guix. At least it is a good SWH-test-package :-) Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/t4ENrkTi+Owjxj_j+lP+KQY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXWPAaQAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /WzAAJ9lkjEo0FWccpwlIoGNz/4lO74dzwCcD1Dx6vqdq1MHdthE6yxrNrBXnno= =Thal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/t4ENrkTi+Owjxj_j+lP+KQY--