From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ison Subject: bug#36942: Reconfigure broke GRUB Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:52:20 -0600 Message-ID: <20190820215220.l77uxrcejdyanwxo@cf0> References: <20190807191628.qm3mmpmkobumhsx4@cf0> <87imr8n4lc.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <20190807223655.heflhqiwjwfp7dr2@cf0> <87r25nr0gn.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <20190815112039.d5x4ondia6osghq5@cf0> <874l2hmb24.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <20190816233426.xbo3wwu3prgyg3h6@cf0> <87mug8c5xu.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <20190820142758.jfm6bmasroa6vmvf@cf0> <87r25fzsow.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0C3r-0003qB-Fw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:53:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0C3q-00048g-Ip for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0C3q-00048U-52 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0C3q-0006uR-2A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r25fzsow.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" Cc: 36942@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, Jakob L. Kreuze wrote: > This is perfect (I mean, not that it still doesn't work, but that we > have some error output). I think I know what's going on. The new 'guix > system reconfigure' uses G-Expressions, and it looks like Grub is being > ungexp'd for the wrong architecture. To be sure, what's the architecture > of this machine? > > I'll investigate further and let you know what I find. Thanks again for > doing this. > > Regards, > Jakob That's great, thanks for investigating this. Both the machine architecture and the liveUSB are x86_64.