From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#36636: Tell users to update/reconfigure regularly Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 18:36:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20190714163645.wbvsvxyin43hmjqj@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190713093530.eph5xvkqyhejkodd@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874l3o1x2z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmhUk-0003hb-Ru for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmhUj-00089Y-UC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:37:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hmhUj-00089Q-QD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:37:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hmhUj-0008AQ-MT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:37:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874l3o1x2z.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36636@debbugs.gnu.org Yes, you are right that unattended upgrades are a more responsible default than a notification cron job. Unattended upgrades would resolve this issue. Should an unattended upgrades service be added to Guix’ list of longer-term todos and this bug be closed? Regards, Florian