From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: 36571@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#36571: icecat's CPE data is wrong
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:05:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190710070540.GN1085@macbook41> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2338 bytes --]
currently we have:
(cpe-name . "firefox_esr")
(cpe-version . ,(first (string-split version #\-)
and it should be:
(cpe-name . "firefox")
(cpe-version . ,(first (string-split version #\.)
however, this returns results for firefox@60, which I'm pretty sure
doesn't take into account that we're not running 60.0.0 but 60.8.0. With
the change 'guix lint -c cve iceat' returns:
icecat@60.8.0-guix1: probably vulnerable to CVE-2019-9788, CVE-2019-9789, CVE-2019-9791, CVE-2019-9792, CVE-2019-9793, CVE-2019-9794, CVE-2019-9795, CVE-2019-9796, CVE-2019-9797, CVE-2019-9798, CVE-2019-9799, CVE-2019-9801, CVE-2019-9802, CVE-2019-9803, CVE-2019-9804, CVE-2019-9805, CVE-2019-9806, CVE-2019-9807, CVE-2019-9808, CVE-2019-9809, CVE-2019-9810, CVE-2019-9813, CVE-2018-12358, CVE-2018-12359, CVE-2018-12360, CVE-2018-12361, CVE-2018-12362, CVE-2018-12363, CVE-2018-12364, CVE-2018-12365, CVE-2018-12366, CVE-2018-12367, CVE-2018-12368, CVE-2018-12369, CVE-2018-12370, CVE-2018-12375, CVE-2018-12376, CVE-2018-12377, CVE-2018-12378, CVE-2018-12379, CVE-2018-12381, CVE-2018-12383, CVE-2018-12385, CVE-2018-12386, CVE-2018-12387, CVE-2018-12388, CVE-2018-12390, CVE-2018-12391, CVE-2018-12392, CVE-2018-12395, CVE-2018-12396, CVE-2018-12397, CVE-2018-12398, CVE-2018-12399, CVE-2018-12400, CVE-2018-12401, CVE-2018-12402, CVE-2018-12403, CVE-2018-12405, CVE-2018-12406, CVE-2018-12407, CVE-2018-18492, CVE-2018-18493, CVE-2018-18494, CVE-2018-18495, CVE-2018-18496, CVE-2018-18497, CVE-2018-18498, CVE-2018-18499, CVE-2018-18500, CVE-2018-18501, CVE-2018-18502, CVE-2018-18503, CVE-2018-18504, CVE-2018-18505, CVE-2018-18506, CVE-2018-18510, CVE-2018-5150, CVE-2018-5151, CVE-2018-5152, CVE-2018-5153, CVE-2018-5154, CVE-2018-5155, CVE-2018-5156, CVE-2018-5157, CVE-2018-5158, CVE-2018-5159, CVE-2018-5160, CVE-2018-5163, CVE-2018-5164, CVE-2018-5166, CVE-2018-5167, CVE-2018-5168, CVE-2018-5169, CVE-2018-5172, CVE-2018-5173, CVE-2018-5174, CVE-2018-5175, CVE-2018-5176, CVE-2018-5177, CVE-2018-5179, CVE-2018-5180, CVE-2018-5181, CVE-2018-5182, CVE-2018-5186, CVE-2018-5187, CVE-2018-5188
which just seems like too much.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-gnu-icecat-Update-cpe-name.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1090 bytes --]
From 2eb51419218e77c4ccb517c642e8fc7e40724973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 09:59:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: icecat: Update cpe-name.
* gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm (icecat)[properties]: Update cpe-name,
cpe-version.
---
gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm b/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm
index ff382b2388..c3931c2594 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm
@@ -939,8 +939,8 @@ features built-in privacy-protecting features.")
(license license:mpl2.0) ;and others, see toolkit/content/license.html
(properties
`((ftp-directory . "/gnu/gnuzilla")
- (cpe-name . "firefox_esr")
- (cpe-version . ,(first (string-split version #\-)))))))
+ (cpe-name . "firefox")
+ (cpe-version . ,(first (string-split version #\.)))))))
(define-public conkeror
;; The Conkeror web browser relied on XULRunner, which IceCat > 50 no longer
--
2.22.0
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-10 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-10 7:05 Efraim Flashner [this message]
2019-07-11 20:34 ` bug#36571: icecat's CPE data is wrong Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-14 12:33 ` Efraim Flashner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190710070540.GN1085@macbook41 \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=36571@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).