From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: bug#36335: Is /dev/kvm missing ACLs?
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 10:41:14 +0200
Message-ID: <20190701104114.0d0aca46@scratchpost.org>
References: <87sgs1c4r0.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9wu4v3l.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87d0izlere.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgrv16rm.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_/5LvMGATds7=.rj=6uU6k2zk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39283)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhrsx-0003M3-OS
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:42:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhrsw-0001lE-A1
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:42:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34118)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hhrsw-0001lA-5q
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:42:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhrsw-0003ly-1I
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:42:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36335.B36335.156197048614459@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87sgrv16rm.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 36335@debbugs.gnu.org

--Sig_/5LvMGATds7=.rj=6uU6k2zk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:45:33 +0200
Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> I suspected a udev rule but =E2=80=98grep=E2=80=99 didn=E2=80=99t find an=
y that explicitly does
> that, and there=E2=80=99s no code in eudev that fiddles with ACLs either,=
 and
> nothing obvious in devtmpfs.c in Linux.  So=E2=80=A6 it=E2=80=99s a myste=
ry.

Might be elogind.  It sets some ACLs on login.


--Sig_/5LvMGATds7=.rj=6uU6k2zk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl0ZxyoACgkQ5xo1VCww
uqUNMQf5AUKYuUZigE1cx2lJR6Zc7kaSqXmrKmdrcObWh0ekKECd5x6805XbkSMQ
+jczH1z5SfbvamIGRUHV9/zPkkxjmqMQujrKiQskx4SF95J7/0Z9WtGDvEhMU0RA
tZte6SzpO+mU6uZI2zIl0o/CTh6Zv3xzwWLqF+L99xWza9NRxoa3f2NZeoHCMFU6
nFeAP5LJ2dbBemo+MTZoI2LvE9cnd595QjU0k/QMwS7DLyvyQ1gKnToPQR5gyoWh
buDQ5lzWfDY/c2aDFNTjTTrssNw8xSbQIT/QZg+WDaKrWeF2bwqHHNEckp9l6hai
8K/bfmDKHal1LNwHbZ/IHHT6EH62Zg==
=wTZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/5LvMGATds7=.rj=6uU6k2zk--