From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: bug#36069: Menu-based installer unusable through noVNC Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:06:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20190625170603.176cb07b@alma-ubu> References: <20190625002420.27685559@alma-ubu> <87v9wtn4u9.fsf@gnu.org> <36FEF9C6-B901-4E6B-920B-00E545A10279@vllmrt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Fsbk+pf415PwbIjvuJPopTI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfn2X-00011Q-KU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:07:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfn2M-0004qu-6u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:07:14 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfn2E-0004gx-7H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:07:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfn2E-0005sV-0O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:07:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <36FEF9C6-B901-4E6B-920B-00E545A10279@vllmrt.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Robert Vollmert Cc: 36069@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/Fsbk+pf415PwbIjvuJPopTI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:09:48 +0200 Robert Vollmert wrote: > > On 25. Jun 2019, at 15:59, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > I think Robert concluded that the bug was in noVNC. =20 >=20 > Rather, I couldn=E2=80=99t prove the bug was anywhere else. >=20 > > What we=E2=80=99d need is either something to fix on our side (but ther= e=E2=80=99s > > apparently nothing), or something to report to noVNC, or a > > workaround we could have on our side specifically for this use > > case. =20 >=20 > It seems noVNC isn=E2=80=99t involved here, though, with the only clearly > common factor being Guix, so maybe the bug is there after all? (At > least, as far as I can tell, Guacamole does not involve noVNC.) Guacamole and noVNC have no common roots, AFAIK. So, with a different VNC-Software showing the same problems, I decided to re-open this bug, though I have no proof that it is really a Guix-Problem. At least people who want to install Guix would be annoyed and might run away. As Robert said, he didn't experience this with any other Distro, that could be a hint we are doing something wrong here. I guess you (Ludovic) have tried the installer with QEMU and its VNC-Server, maybe even with different VNC-clients? We could try different setups in that directions. We could look extensively at the code with the mode switches and compare it with specs about mode-switching? Until now, I have no knowledge in that area. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Fsbk+pf415PwbIjvuJPopTI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXRI4WwAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /WuSAJ91YJiaZOoKJ3JDdI8FHYjzS+1MTwCglbqNdBoJmLXXrq6GTwv9Dr1C4yU= =SosX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Fsbk+pf415PwbIjvuJPopTI--