From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#35941: Newt installer failure when wifi name is #f Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:15:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20190528111519.2fa1ec58@scratchpost.org> References: <87h89fj6p3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/TYslIQO/N64BNJS7/W5q2s6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVYDD-0006PK-Vi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 05:16:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVYDD-0000fh-2t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 05:16:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVYDC-0000fM-B1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 05:16:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hVYDC-0004eP-4s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 05:16:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h89fj6p3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 35941@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/TYslIQO/N64BNJS7/W5q2s6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pierre, On Tue, 28 May 2019 10:59:04 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I've tried the installer today and it failed at the wifi selection, > printing a stack trace which allowed me to investigate. Since I could > not save it (shouldn't we dump it to a file by the way?),=20 I think it's in /tmp/last-installer-error, isn't it? > Or, more directly in connman.scm: >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ > (define-record-type* > service make-service > service? > - (name service-name) ; string > + (name service-name > + (default "")) > (type service-type) ; string > (path service-path) ; string > (strength service-strength) ; integer > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- How would that help? The default is only used if NAME is missing in the constructor call, right? Or is it also used if NAME is present but #f ? > Thoughts? Have you checked whether you can then still connect to that nameless Wifi? (since apparently connman.scm passes service-path to connman, it should be fine. But still good to test it) I think there are some "security" settings on Wifi routers that allow you to hide the SSID or something, so I guess that's how this problem sprung up. --Sig_/TYslIQO/N64BNJS7/W5q2s6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlzs/CcACgkQ5xo1VCww uqWhGAgAicpKjEqoP9vS0ujcfPvK9MTYVnT+NNbECfJvl6gpbZ+1HjzZy+vm+hRk RXVgnDrNL27oPx8ZoVRRbwvO2bts69Z59UdFdH0UiF9zCmE4g2NV6pdnUrc8D0tS N2dZQrySDtK/MlP/rvObc7jF6htlgRFobjdavmdI4K8i9OkW/eLANDm+L1/aGsVL fA1mzE4cuu0QNIaZGZX/fc0fDcWEBdsU+q5ewAJfIL9KZPS/Zxe1g+wl1IHz678q NtSbYYKlH1GnCcyutF9xuMUV0+wkU41OffoFIaJRAKvCoU+kfypg5NXPn4iUlGvM x7Jg05widgOAcE/i8UgWXgtw/M32HA== =F8tX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/TYslIQO/N64BNJS7/W5q2s6--