From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35662: Really relocatable binaries crash with Permission denied Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20190516110257.f3ftexzyk2c5akw5@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190511050518.ozmvhsov6meg6g5f@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ftpivlnv.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513103440.xkri3uk2oxtk4rn6@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87r292qx30.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513151736.ffbuofr3vmyqaoov@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87tvdyozra.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513204524.ozcnp6faamrbfkcv@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190514080525.xspgsob6payn2ioa@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87h89wydf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnojd9s6.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREB9-0004k1-PZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:04:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREB8-0007au-M9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:04:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREB8-0007aA-Hf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hREB8-000143-6K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:04:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnojd9s6.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: 35662@debbugs.gnu.org On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:20:25PM +0200, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Hello Ludovic and Florian, > > I cannot help here, just some thoughts > > as you probably already know, Florian, ZFS is not supported in Linux for > various reasons, above all for a controversial licensing problem [1] > I had forgotten. I remember now that I heard about this. >From a Guix point of view, I believe this maybe should be a WONT-FIX/NOT-OUR-BUG. I will try and set up current ZFS 0.7.13 and test if guix pack -RR works there in a week. Feel free to skip this unless you are interested: I asked the admins again. They are using Proxmox 5.4. They say they have disabled user namespaces by commenting the corresponding line in the Proxmox config file (but I am unsure if this just disables Linux Container use of user namespaces or something). They use the ZFS from Proxmox. I looked and found confirmation that this Proxmox uses current ZFS 0.7.13 at: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve/dists/stretch/pve-no-subscription/binary-amd64/ > I agree, this seems a zfsonlinux bug: Florian please can you report it > upstream to zfsonlinux? > I will try to reproduce on a private PC in a week, then I can report. Regards, Florian