From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35662: Really relocatable binaries crash with Permission denied Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 10:05:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20190514080525.xspgsob6payn2ioa@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190509220136.tli7um2heocifrpq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87o94ax9lw.fsf@gnu.org> <20190511050518.ozmvhsov6meg6g5f@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ftpivlnv.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513103440.xkri3uk2oxtk4rn6@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87r292qx30.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513151736.ffbuofr3vmyqaoov@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87tvdyozra.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513204524.ozcnp6faamrbfkcv@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQSRp-0005o4-PU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:06:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQSRn-0005Jo-Or for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:06:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQSRm-0005Ir-Is for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:06:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQSRm-0008V7-Bi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:06:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190513204524.ozcnp6faamrbfkcv@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 35662@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:45:24PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:39:21PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > I suspect ZFS-on-Linux (right?) is doing something unusual here: > > I suppose it is ZFS on Linux; it is Linux, I can ask the admins if it > could be something else. > The admins have confirmed that they use “Proxmox on ZFS” (judging from it is ZFS on Linux) and they have confirmed that they have disabled user namespaces in their Proxmox settings. Regards, Florian