From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35540: Installer displays encrypted partition password entry in cleartext Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:13:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20190507081340.qa25xrc7pngxsxkt@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190503085437.opsw5whdkzmwrbrm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190503113018.5be80808@scratchpost.org> <20190503115024.20787d13@sybil.lepiller.eu> <87tvebbq9v.fsf@gnu.org> <20190504210632.i3tyhzisfw6anpyb@pelzflorian.localdomain> <877eb5duxo.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgtrkijb.fsf@gnu.org> <20190506181446.qsakunri5ewvanph@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190506192935.agzovjt2uwktoqys@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87zhnzfjwk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNvEk-0007Jn-6s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 04:14:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNvEi-0005IS-9q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 04:14:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNvEh-0005Hs-8q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 04:14:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNvEh-0001Nj-2r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 04:14:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zhnzfjwk.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 35540@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 09:43:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I agree. I’ll commit the patch below, which works fine for German (at > least before the “Hide” checkbox patch). > > Thanks, > Ludo’. > Fits perfectly. Thank you all of you! Regards, Florian