From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35586: GNOME Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 20:52:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20190505185230.bofz6ewln5gs7vde@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNMG0-0000AP-58 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:53:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNMFy-0003Xo-TD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:53:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNMFy-0003XF-H3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNMFy-0008G2-El for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Raghav Gururajan Cc: 35586@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:20:39PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Hello Guix! > > Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help- > guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug, where some > GNOME Core Applications are actually packaged in guix but have not been > included in guix's "gnome" package. > Thank you for doing something about this! > found out that the following gnome core application packages are indeed > packaged in guix, but have not been included in guix's gnome package. > > gnome-calendar > gnome-clocks > gnome-common > gnome-desktop gnome-common and gnome-desktop are libraries, not core applications. > gnome-dictionary > gnome-doc-utils gnome-doc-utils is not a core application. > gnome-icon-theme > gnome-klotski > gnome-maps > gnome-mime-data > gnome-mines > gnome-mpv gnome-mpv is not core. > gnome-planner > gnome-screenshot > gnome-shell-extensions > gnome-sudoku > gnome-todo > gnome-tweak-tool > gnome-vfs I don’t quite know, is gnome-vfs the same as gvfs? > gnome-video-effects > This appears to be a codec pack or something (?), not an application. > The following gnome core applications are also already packaged in guix > but requires correct renaming before adding to guix's gnome package? > > rhythmbox --> gnome-music > shotwell --> gnome-photos > Parabola GNU/Linux-libre packaging shows that these are not the same app and should not be renamed. [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss shotwell community/shotwell 2:0.30.4-1 A digital photo organizer designed for the GNOME desktop environment [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-photos extra/gnome-photos 3.32.0-1 (gnome) Access, organize, and share your photos on GNOME [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss rhythmbox extra/rhythmbox 3.4.3-1 Music playback and management application community/ario 1.6-1 A GTK client for MPD inspired by Rhythmbox but much lighter and faster [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-music extra/gnome-music 1:3.32.1-1 (gnome) Music player and management application > The following gnome core applications have already been included in > guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming? > > epiphany --> gnome-web > envice --> gnome-documents > eog --> gnome-images > file-roller --> gnome-autoar > gedit --> gnome-text > nautilus --> gnome-files > Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by e.g. Epiphany and not GNOME Web, including Epiphany developers. Of course, there are more non-packaged applications. I also remember https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/ who says, for example, that gnome-tweaks is *not* core. > I really hope if the above modifications are made, it will fulfill the > actual description of guix's gnome package (http://guix.gnu.org/package > s/gnome-3.28.2/). ☺ > Yes, I agree, that should be the goal. Regards, Florian