From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#35542: Installer does not display full backtrace on error Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 19:38:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20190504173807.2fxseiyoa4nvaoae@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20190503085927.ib5gudynudeknclm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ef5fetnv.fsf@gnu.org> <8736lvka3k.fsf@gmail.com> <20190503174633.otzjizlfjhr4bkca@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87y33msgmy.fsf@gmail.com> <20190504122403.noe5hirk6u3qtmcm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190504145409.00768bf6@scratchpost.org> <87pnoy42o7.fsf@gmail.com> <20190504190617.1b8a8efa@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMycw-0006w5-G9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 13:39:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMycp-000633-I5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 13:39:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMycn-00062S-OY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 13:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMycn-0003fp-Lo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 13:39:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190504190617.1b8a8efa@scratchpost.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 35542@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 07:06:17PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > So I'd be for either presenting the entire backtrace or suppressing the > entire backtrace, not having teaser backtraces :) Let’s assume someone is getting an error in the installer for some reason. If they are Guix developers, maybe they understand the issue from the (trimmed) backtrace. If they are not well-versed in Unix, with the backtrace they can exfiltrate the (trimmed) error with a camera. I hope I understand the purpose correctly. Maybe it saves the people on the mailing list complicated explanations. These maybes become more likely with a fuller backtrace, I suppose. Regards, Florian