From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: bug#35034: One libgit2 derivation fails on armhf, another succeeds
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:40:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20190328224014.1dc8fb02@scratchpost.org>
References: <875zs2d99d.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	boundary="Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56650)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h9clj-0002Hp-Kg
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:41:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h9cli-0006pu-MB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:41:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49517)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h9cli-0006pY-Fi
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:41:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h9cli-0007re-5r
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:41:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35034.B35034.155380923630188@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <875zs2d99d.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 35034@debbugs.gnu.org

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mark,

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:38:27 -0400
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:

> unless 'package-for-guile-2.0' is somehow modifying the
> 'libgit2' derivation.
>=20
> Any idea what's going on here?

Not really, *but* I've recently replaced Python by Guile in libgit2
tests.

Maybe that broke something - especially if package-for-guile-2.0 somehow
either provides both guile versions as native inputs or selects one
incompatible with the "generate.scm" I wrote.

Here, (ice-9 textual-ports) seems to be not found.  Does it not exist in
guile 2.0 ? (I wasn't aware we still used guile 2.0 for something...)

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlydP0YACgkQ5xo1VCww
uqVIlwf7BTRyk2KHj5WDEsSYOIs6wjmCnBp7bca3EOLPntMgR4sSTn+3Ehczjlwh
76n2uUD+F5JgzAJatY06lkbbEKEoD52+W2NZ53KeTyeYU3dCruRTUwyJ39v/n7wr
q3uATj5ZQPHWEcw4mXIDVkn122PWzz4LpRT7eRoqsGXVv/dJnDZoj/zbZ0CVuLSt
Gor2DBT8nX7FVfnjS73U7hjM8nxkJaoaUY+27SSnjUvfq74U0qvXqEIsMgUkaGBs
hFaQq+ZQvTsh4jXUo5P9j3Cy+eEJ1EegKLuuqP9NWv9Dl0jfp9jpviVIBm7S87ZG
qqdnKAeRLTSj9nE7brWGzHi0nqtFYA==
=CtrJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Z.E4UDRqYxg_/HbnVLl7k4Y--