From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#34717: GPL and Openssl incompatibilities in u-boot and possibly others Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:12:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20190306191252.577335c1@scratchpost.org> References: <87tvgkiurn.fsf@ponder> <87zhq8f2zz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/jPsCwQ_WMPfIlcICTkXEN.k"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1b2V-00050K-M8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:13:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1b2Q-0006iX-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:13:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1b2M-0006ev-PI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:13:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1b2M-0007Z1-H0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 13:13:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87zhq8f2zz.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 34717@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/jPsCwQ_WMPfIlcICTkXEN.k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > openssl@1.0 has 7,029 dependent packages, so it may be hard to sort it > out. I wonder what would be the best way to approach it. I can't believe I seriously suggest the following but: A license algebra and guix commands that automate part of the lawyering, by using the "license" field of the packages, which would now have at least "and-license" and "or-license" operators and maybe also finer-grained ones, and a placeholder for "it's too difficult, sort it out manually" (maybe just detect the list we have now as "it's too difficult"). If we do it, we should add a disclaimer that it doesn't replace the need for legal counsel entirely. --Sig_/jPsCwQ_WMPfIlcICTkXEN.k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlyADaQACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUcfQf/evYYUJTPsIxtOB2gIzcrO3GAluInaWhNSbYX29HbvxukUou4FEBxMqd5 qxm6G8jaKiwwSm9KgDEmp6hQ6B/nWzKHq0ZjSryX3QWG3nO/wr8rw3BtgWv/bAr0 IKhcw9lO+dV9OXDN6LLM/8oQ83hyyJpez2NkHQaOAJQ2bl5dNnMErtwFSZ2FCb+b R0Y3sJOb6Ni5eQ1iCHWaQqWjyMsV+7+dKHMqZ66jX/nKcfw7DTCEdmtFFPW/0nqL H/tzqTwaQtQp5WboYu2n8rPbHBEc4xRSCADgCIh7bOFgpN5rTM6aMicSfOjdFsuo vPqUYRv0OnCiMgrzBlu1BYLpbj3fyg== =dirL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jPsCwQ_WMPfIlcICTkXEN.k--