From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#31868: Test failure for GnuCash 3.3 (previously 3.0) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:45:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20190102074558.GA23211@macbook41> References: <87a7rurxoa.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhskdtiq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gebF3-0004mK-5R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 02:47:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gebF0-0001Um-02 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 02:47:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gebEz-0001UH-Qs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 02:47:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gebEz-0006cM-H9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 02:47:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zhskdtiq.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 31868@debbugs.gnu.org --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 03:15:09PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Using latest Guix, GnuCash 3.3 fails its test suite by only one test: >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > [fail] line:644, test: dual amount column, first transaction correct > transaction.scm/display options > -> expected: ("01/03/18" "$103 income" "Root.Asset.Bank" "$103.00" "$103= =2E00") > -> obtained: ("01/03/19" "$103 income" "Root.Asset.Bank" "$103.00" "$103= =2E00") > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >=20 Haven't looked at the test yet, is this a 'yyyy' vs 'YYYY' error in ISO8601? --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlwsbDEACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EXtxAApg9xx6OlL60eiqXpXCkO8ZzpYHP2c2OtPZ8dUWu1Ec8L3/ys4Q1tYWf5 Yb4Q7DsCKY4XXaKaK28BJX1XxoiM5vxVIcSuYmgXNHb0JME5SZnOE6DSZl5EjM0u MJdp2X0UMTXUa3PmbyEw5szQGNBpbllPJN5k/jyC7JkW+rhsbizheWtkytVQbp69 kEFMdAkzmHKaPm0lfP9dVrg9/lYEHhhtQ3eTcLiCt4Yuo/Zd6No4SyzvzbarfqWF m8muDbx7b5uLlW+A7PS2dM3k0K7JJb9FqZ03tagREyRb6ODgIcUJitOhf6JOByMD 7QnfV6ZpUNp/f7zlaWp6tKW+AxITQSnxqRKVnvUnWedkfbIpZLhjuFhYpkqFrVoV JxOasWGHwfvFflLxb5O4MrJ5phzJehf3fvdrH/OYe6GYYU73Q+7/e4/h2bmZJiFy LjDHeNo2FxA8v7K70kOYsva9TxUrv7BgI7CLo/QSl4LNqbGoSOn6hQQPjv5CxmHg WW8xDBE+yAxFjwhg/uBYGtz6awiSRAsulD4Khe0CbRef0dHlNIUnwrd1rJ25ympj WFNheXmQ0C0UBqjPzjFXTtHhqWYnZivD8JvMSuoIsGDZf+LIRkXWxvDkd4pIXstC UXu1xTG6dKI/XJOTLbsn4SXo0elHQRI+j/gDB/KrH1fuKtMK39s= =ycsN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--