From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20? Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 20:19:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20181215201904.62659d07__47418.4021856219$1544901503$gmane$org@scratchpost.org> References: <68f9fc17-94f5-dcc2-f54d-61d6e2bf384d@riseup.net> <20181208181214.2308472a@scratchpost.org> <20181209215126.GA10968@jurong> <20181210113014.0e4e76eb@scratchpost.org> <20181210211224.GA7317@jurong> <20181214215026.66ac1df2@scratchpost.org> <20181215102906.GA4621@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/2qaKS_YJhEFpW4diPbxQZFZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYFU0-00037W-4u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:20:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYFTw-0005sI-Pb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:20:16 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYFTl-0005bO-W4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:20:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gYFTl-0007sc-M5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:20:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181215102906.GA4621@jurong> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33676@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/2qaKS_YJhEFpW4diPbxQZFZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andreas, On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:29:06 +0100 Andreas Enge wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:50:26PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > can you check whether dirindex (hashtables for directory) is enabled? > > # tune2fs -l /dev/... | grep -o dir_index > > See also https://blog.merovius.de/2013/10/20/ext4-mysterious-no-space-l= eft-on.html =20 >=20 > It was, and I disabled it. Hopefully this does not break anything... > But does this not mean a big performance hit on /gnu/store/.links? It does mean that because it uses a linear search to find the file names no= w. What ext filesystem is it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 says that ext4 supports B trees - which should have no problems with hash collisions (it uses operator< to construct a tree -- and not hashes to construct a list). --Sig_/2qaKS_YJhEFpW4diPbxQZFZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlwVU6gACgkQ5xo1VCww uqXPzAf+LHwmkROAgHY+KJMT7ZX2+yAuomP2qXnB5Yh+E+n25+c+R2gVWldL5yE7 6wmrQ09cgSiEZTJFIeiKiBVYnIDsJrnSFcPhqfMawkxr8SMibn0W5uCU0KcvnqPA G76lwJzkJjZAuNlrx0b0cP29dW7J7Qik7bWb1R+ozmACMcBElPyQr6QLY+DOYoEy 8Rr6OWzw/TehaZwDOxEC7gx+oFpAU2wnP21i1Op+dHGYXynPETmT/PX2dhM7Utmm A46tQQsEGhvu0/+c78SLcyrT8B5iu7ijyLHVOMV1fmgamH3QZ9OcLak10Gd3Ix6e woDhMhYgsdWWifuZYMIWu7XJUU5Jyg== =KOmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2qaKS_YJhEFpW4diPbxQZFZ--