From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?=
	<bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Subject: bug#33647: First `guix pull' behaves unexpectedly
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:41:36 +0100
Message-ID: <20181207104136.4e98df66@alma-ubu>
References: <874lbqu2j3.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <87k1km3bn0.fsf@elephly.net>
	<871s6ugsrq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgz9spgw.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	boundary="Sig_/_B3URVze/BGC2Nozp0NaT7g";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43136)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVCe7-0002RI-FB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 04:42:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVCe2-0001IL-H2
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 04:42:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60260)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gVCe2-0001I8-Bx
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 04:42:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gVCe2-0003Zf-3u
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 04:42:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33647.D33647.154417571013718.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87sgz9spgw.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de>
Cc: 33647-done@debbugs.gnu.org

--Sig_/_B3URVze/BGC2Nozp0NaT7g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:36:31 +0100
Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de> wrote:

> I believe this is it.  This also explains why =E2=80=98which guix=E2=80=
=99 returned
> the updated guix while =E2=80=98guix --version=E2=80=99 claimed it was st=
ill the older
> version, which I found rather confusing.
> I am afraid being unaware of this has led me to inadvertently
> downgrade GuixSD whenever I reconfigured for the first time after a
> fresh install.

OK, then I'm closing this issue.

Bj=C3=B6rn

--Sig_/_B3URVze/BGC2Nozp0NaT7g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlwKQFEACgkQvyhstlk+X/25OgCff2C5r9au/f7ecPAIGIQJjtiE
bGwAn2b/WrVZOhxD0yziZyLOFRWZ6/sH
=JwNp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/_B3URVze/BGC2Nozp0NaT7g--