From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:24:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20181128002415.64970ecd@alma-ubu> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnF0-0006qI-By for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:58:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnEx-000437-7R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:58:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnEw-000424-Ou for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:58:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnEw-0001dx-HM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:58:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 33509@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:36:49 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Bj=C3=B6rn, >=20 > > So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to > > GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If > > it doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk > > is a bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. =20 >=20 > This is only going to get worse as we already have a later version of > GNOME in a branch, which is just waiting for the core-updates merge. >=20 > If the package sees no further development we may want to drop it. > What do you think? I have no opinion about that package. I don't know it, I just saw that compile-error on core-updates and tried to fix it. With your question, I double checked that this is really dead and found in the bug tracker a link to a new, active fork: https://github.com/NicoHood/arc-theme They claim they are Arch/Debian/Ubuntu maintainers. I can try to prepare a patch for that. In the meantime, I try to test it. Do you know how to do that? Is installing the package enough, and then running gnome-tweak-tool? Or does it have to go into system-packages? Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlv90iAACgkQvyhstlk+X/0p9gCgrk6OhZW0JEmfetW15LREqZ6L 3r4AoI6bOfkOpRSylyAnHxy7EhNIoP9J =FDmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE--