From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rutger Helling Subject: bug#33325: xpra doesn't work out-of-the-box (implicit dependencies) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20181126093711.77fbd92c@mykolab.com> References: <8736sa2vcm.fsf@inria.fr> <20181109160321.3346add3@mykolab.com> <87a7mepuxl.fsf@inria.fr> <87y39huo9x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/m_KfQj/ZW7a3re9UJZ9Leyo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRCP8-00012E-E3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:38:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRCP4-0008I3-FV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:38:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRCP4-0008Hv-8u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:38:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRCP4-0000Be-3o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 03:38:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87y39huo9x.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 33325@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/m_KfQj/ZW7a3re9UJZ9Leyo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, apologies for the delayed reaction, I've been quite busy. Oddly enough the commands seem to work fine on GuixSD. Can you maybe tell me what distro you're using? I don't have access to a foreign distro at the moment, but I'll try to look into it next weekend. Do you have the 'xauth' command? If not, could you install that and see if it makes a difference? On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 17:15:22 +0100 ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Hello, >=20 > ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: >=20 > > $ guix environment --ad-hoc xpra --pure > > [env]$ xpra start :100 > > Warning: Xorg binary not found, assuming the wrapper is needed! > > ludo@ribbon ~/src/guix [env]$ Entering daemon mode; any further > > errors will be reported to: /run/user/1000/xpra/:100.log > > > > [env]$ xpra list > > Warning: Xorg binary not found, assuming the wrapper is needed! > > No xpra sessions found =20 >=20 > FWIW I get the same problem with the recent xpra 2.4.2 update. >=20 > > I believe the problem should be reproducible in a =E2=80=98--pure=E2=80= =99 > > environment. Perhaps the missing Python modules mentioned in the > > log are the root cause? =20 >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > Thanks in advance, > Ludo=E2=80=99. --Sig_/m_KfQj/ZW7a3re9UJZ9Leyo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEAVThuRzJ2e93ZI3n86cn20T8yjYFAlv7sLcACgkQ86cn20T8 yjYvmwf9FJ8bwJAo7a8khly/LqRIC4b0tFxpTPdBGzjXLavv5WSTW/PH5pGSxLxE jZe5gkM8ittF5x55/MiPH8UHhuO+2LUcZfYFCyt5WKTdDnfXLoAJBBuUL2Y7xla/ Z9aVxPyU5V2fs18N5wfjdvU3FbRsi3E+gDEMZnwbNWIWuT2H6TPGWhfhra1npx6I 3f/GEM45XzTIS81VlEoA47HPyQHmSa2UUMSmdil8u2lz4a1BpUvC0wMq2fkzS7d9 41TEFrtFPU8swiS7fWG4aJ3YzrAttqs36gyriH2qqkgdkHDDl3XWkR9flJGy9sX9 YUYsp9VvHM4sgYjGjJl9nSMGsR8QkA== =+j2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/m_KfQj/ZW7a3re9UJZ9Leyo--