From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#33261: [substitute-urls] Fails when given only "berlin.guixsd.org" Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:01:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20181105210135.GF19298@jasmine.lan> References: <7461b803-d8af-2e76-358e-35592f3ca995@riseup.net> <20181105191322.64a47ea0@alma-ubu> <20181105194618.GA18731@jasmine.lan> <62e5ca73-88e9-7e50-ea0c-f4a8f4c50dbf@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJm0b-0000hi-Nj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:02:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJm0Y-0005v1-F5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:02:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJm0Y-0005uV-9w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJm0Y-0003Ct-68 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:02:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62e5ca73-88e9-7e50-ea0c-f4a8f4c50dbf@riseup.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: swedebugia Cc: 33261@debbugs.gnu.org --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:48:55PM +0100, swedebugia wrote: > Do you have any ideas how to implement anything better? >=20 > A newt-ncurses interface maybe? I didn't necessarily mean an interactive tool, but a more unified way of handling substitute server selection. It's a critical aspect of Guix security so we'd probably want to think on it for a while. --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlvgr68ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwj5wRAAtbutzSBeRd61NAfD5ZUiEwtGjANjD5EkvPJJWmeLFCJ+uAPJ7tEo2QIV TYYJCuwBLZ8yS/9lMZz3OyjeEMHh6GyOaOVh8PE1MuTmhNp8Y+2dq0OmmAji7MtD rzfyRvYmqb1Db0v64NcyUvrds/FGj5zTLR9/Z/d9cfQYeDtE9ojWP7pvykSnX4+u imJJCdhjBn/jw9nl34Id+Qpcnme6nKj1FKtX/6Bx6eCcs1XhS7br/dF+T5D9wy98 PM6sCo6gaW91XbX6hXdiRtbHTuFfRooALWigJfMMRVy+PRIn4Aw97ZsscSeKgyTE FiWzpe2y6P37D0j29kpKOvyVwpANmhbtZA7TyYOjJgEHh/HwJC4ElQiEfdj+u8BJ F3GZU8uolgPLHlwqHZkcf/s92LlnLN9Cqc1MkCciCMqVsqzH95GWyw8vjDX4ZPUa bdY+eWpbF16Uv+tRxShFttIv2for4oE25ZA3dDkagWmQminPwwmR03F2tVl0yW5g 5CsFUx7eFmBwfJPgwmM64AQovsVQ25jydpOmux3COpM9W5TN9zh/WFpE+ltPmtER iwnF0HtNTMpmqy+WHOqrPWZTaao48Zog/rKUwhjFqrlZ5dpJjKvL60OREKLDcn+c 8kH6QZLlYg2ZwNQBjaPkeZvesGPQWTKS2os2uOj9T5m/J2T8yeE= =AjX/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cpvLTH7QU4gwfq3S--