From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#33137: [Wishlist] recursive guix lint Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20181031095738.GJ1297@macbook41> References: <20181024123915.GB1297@macbook41> <875zxqup8r.fsf@gnu.org> <20181027203013.GF1297@macbook41> <878t2h66yf.fsf@gnu.org> <20181030073529.GI1297@macbook41> <87sh0nz4ir.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdJFN6SSISdF2ksn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHnGF-0007Pd-1j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 05:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHnGE-0007q5-59 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 05:58:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHnGE-0007pp-0b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 05:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gHnGD-0005VP-Rr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 05:58:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sh0nz4ir.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 33137@debbugs.gnu.org --sdJFN6SSISdF2ksn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 07:13:48PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Efraim Flashner skribis: >=20 > > I meant more like "hey, khard can be upgraded to 0.12.2, after I've > > checked the upgrade with 'guix lint khard', now I'd like to check the r= est > > of the dependency tree with 'guix lint --recursive khard' to see if > > anything else can be upgraded or has any linter errors." >=20 > Oh I see. So to me this would be a =E2=80=98guix refresh=E2=80=99 featur= e rather than > =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99, but I agree it would be nice (and not too ha= rd to > implement.) >=20 I think ultimately implementing it in both would be good, but even just having it for refresh would go a long way to shedding light on some of our libraries that aren't updates as often as they might be. Especially with the scripting langaguages. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --sdJFN6SSISdF2ksn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlvZfI0ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FRdw/+Je7TecE4GmGrOFiRk4Nt2jI2BLb97gnlHsfbYfuIb1LwuXMHoNLYjuUd cXjedBpBEP//7dXKM7CaJPZpYGSxTgCRnlLwW/LsxwCUHAF5pkXrAo++Rv4VsWfs np/JYZcPJXRZPOyFkEqRgCNztOogb8Y1l//CG1ElWJjfJFQGhNHKIXNgPQ86PcFu pqz4ZyYpp/bTS2bdpVw8n5M88R8/l0N2QP/dRIGsbgyJe+Scn55zuMe/A/amj5J1 LcsoC5dB+mbtVHhgGbtYU9mQoU2lOZZ0MyNxF87KP+fBpiIv8YHCDOJ7PDvDGpVY uHetFHe1iF+TYu/ObMBCjt0gd6jXec+2fufbIKbRSc5o7ckqcRqzDqWjs70w3jOS VLSthfeMkVebK9MuIhlZcOtukp/y483Kbr5sdOCojV3PJBel6t9ds6Z+3fi5Hnnv HQ5p164q5HNmWM4YvvXT9BkgCotSK4z1dNyeJNDOqsPKzM+cVz4gesQW2MjuHD5L EWqTpeX6eVChgPRcivV59HYylRZwNEVlsP4jIg57Yq5VOzzbZGzWVWfyJun3minW TFgk2npsNYc6qQ48sV/TFKk6zYdO8xFt4lOnIiJoDvfycq2WJxIY1Br/TU3fwAW4 cmPXxsex5/kuFTwtAPEFY/DYtdalpe6dIX54NsfaxbMoUwR+9Bw= =h3mx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdJFN6SSISdF2ksn--