From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Patterson Subject: bug#32770: Packaging SLIME/SWANK as Common Lisp library Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 01:22:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20181003012224.5baff3ac@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> References: <87museeyy5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20180929151630.00cf6396@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <87lg7iwu9i.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1n2wten.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181002045531.78223c72@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca> <878t3gwsrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Zcn-0005Oj-7t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:23:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Zck-0001NW-4d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:23:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Zcj-0001NP-U8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:23:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Zcj-00030S-M2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:23:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t3gwsrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 32770@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Pierre, On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:24:29 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > It'd be nice to have an importer. Maybe we can use Nix's work to > > reduce the amount of investigation needed to get there. > > Absolutely. ASDF is good enough that the vast majority of CL > libraries can be packaged without an itch. > > If we could use Quicklisp or > > http://quickdocs.org/ > > to write a recursive importer, we could get programs like Next > browser packaged in one go but for a couple of tweaks for the 2-3 odd > packages. > > Let me know if you want to work on this, otherwise I'll give it a > shot. > I'd like to be involved as I have some ideas on things we could do differently from Nix that I'd begun investigating. I'll elaborate more once I get the chance to organize my thoughts. Thanks, -- Andy