From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nam Nguyen <namn@berkeley.edu>
Subject: bug#32855: sshuttle /usr/bin/env
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 15:40:01 -0700
Message-ID: <20180929224001.GA10179@antelope>
References: <20180927182323.GA30836@antelope> <20180927192218.GA11125@antelope>
	<87o9ciha1x.fsf@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58445)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g6Nv7-0007qU-GK
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:41:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g6Nv4-000069-7m
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:41:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54996)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1g6Nv4-00005w-3U
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:41:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g6Nv3-0003cV-Px
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:41:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32855.B32855.153826084913884@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o9ciha1x.fsf@tobias.gr>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: 32855@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Tobias,

After testing, I think the /bin/sh substitution introduced a regression.

Lines in question:
(substitute* "sshuttle/ssh.py"
  ;; Perhaps this is unreachable, but don't let's take risks.
  (("/bin/sh") (which "sh")))

$ sshuttle -r user <at> server.com 0/0 -x server.com
ksh: /gnu/store/rb...-bash-minimal-4.4.19/bin/sh: not found
client: fatal: server died with error code 127

The server I am sshing to is not running GuixSD. It is trying to find
/gnu/store/.../bin/sh but it doesn't exst. My local client is running
GuixSD. The only requirements on the server side should be Python. Should
those lines should be removed? I tested without, and it seems to work okay,
at least for my particular setup: GuixSD client --> non-GuixSD server.

I suppose we have to state the assumptions of whether the client and
server are running Guix or not, and arrive at good defaults.