From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#32715: Chromium: scrolling doesn't work after a certain amount of time Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:42:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20180929144254.GA16169@jasmine.lan> References: <87worrnq5v.fsf@lassieur.org> <87va7bnpsc.fsf@lassieur.org> <87bm8wp7pl.fsf@fastmail.com> <87h8i89zow.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6GSY-0004lL-5H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:43:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6GSV-0001tK-09 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:43:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6GSU-0001sY-NI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6GSU-0000Oq-HI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:43:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h8i89zow.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 32715@debbugs.gnu.org --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Cl=E9ment Lassieur wrote: > PS: I'm unsure whether it makes sense to report bug for softwares that > are considered non-free and are just packaged in channels. If it > doesn't, I'll happily close my bugs reports. We don't use our official communication channels (the mailing lists and #guix IRC channel) to recommend non-free software. But Chromium is widely distributed under a BSD license, so I think we should consider it free. Guix goes beyond software freedom by following the FSDG [0], and the Chromium varant being discussed is specifically intended to comply with the FSDG. In general, we don't need to handle bug reports for packages in external channels. In this case, we are working to bring the package into GNU Guix, so it's appropriate to report issues here, in my opinion. [0] https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAluvj2sACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg/sBAAzN2o0J1bT7kpqJNoEkHKon4urZ+79vFkXGjsXwjKKIfw7NzA3OXpu0Sg M+wjAjqdXoAIUyj2ZFGP59A+SUkrsN/e82Az/itHL3nB8Dp5mnKTMCNI0oNyyVJa Nalop7cLRG+Fo2UP1n/3vMQ119fFJnaWhk1DyKXtLKT/jHKTZNrMH4vWMxiZsxlq MkuR/tZWWzFZaQppWBY/ki/rvQFxLrk0xi9cXGi3vP0hiVJ81nI0cZjwqPkXBBaJ EgQWkzoBG9KngL+OiCCGtAMsyDbmdYSRCtTKtig1j9UVUZ3N5tqw+UvT9rqZXthf /IRldcVqWH8g3Zpl6hNFFRXSjRaSwQHHup1ntj0c51ushDliNFcRQlZD9uC0baeR h75V5kDewCgyN+C+W1OkNySSnfjYY1D0i7tFeBtTcz4Z68BqJqWjN0URW+59yLqK MVRzO4KtmgETkXLtvWLLbAmKdHjV/E7FZwu2F4Vd0Z16U0ABkkhucNZKvkgAoQq9 /2qy3u6eeQfay4oJJmEIA4XDs/9DuWOuGqOO+YkhVVbp09ZrVw9upjoUPIIsw0qw CdBMJZXY/UrrxyDj+L5QkfjgeJJRJa8MFBEBAGEYIcs3wQ537tiFrOqaJx7Pixkp 5j1F3K2/vBADUANn5dwWXadwTMx84plzyCQlSnAl2Gi+SyLL9nk= =79R1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--