From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: bug#32466: Wine not building on intel 64bits. Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20180817184906.34fedced@alma-ubu> References: <20180817124124.6ohidy65bu3iihkb@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/F=KgYXYo=l0zCXzTBhngC4A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqhwu-0001ZJ-Ib for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:50:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqhwq-0003of-Av for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:50:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqhwo-0003m8-KE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:50:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqhwo-0006e5-78 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:50:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180817124124.6ohidy65bu3iihkb@thebird.nl> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: 32466@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/F=KgYXYo=l0zCXzTBhngC4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pjotr, On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 14:41:24 +0200 Pjotr Prins wrote: > Recent versions of wine and wine-staging in Guix are not building > after guix pull. I rolled back a month, but even that is a problem on > my 2017 Debian box. I can't check the build farm to see if it is > working there. >=20 > ~/.config/guix/current/bin/guix package ~-i wine-staging >=20 > FAIL: elements/opus > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > Running suite(s): opus > 33%: Checks: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 4 > gstcheck.c:596:E:general:test_opus_encode_nothing:0: (after this > point) Received signal 11 (Segmentation fault) > gstcheck.c:596:E:general:test_opus_encode_samples:0: (after this > point) Received signal 11 (Segmentation fault) > gstcheck.c:596:E:general:test_opus_encode_properties:0: (after this > point) Received signal 11 (Segmentation fault) > elements/opus.c:429:E:general:test_opus_decode_plc_timestamps_with_fec:0: > (after this point) Received signal 11 (Segmentation fault) Check > suite opus ran in 0.030s (tests failed: 4) FAIL elements/opus (exit > status: 4) >=20 >=20 > Backtrace:=20 > 4 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/ki3kvmzipvf8baabfyaw1ncf4ax=EF=BF=BD") In ice-9/eval.scm: > 191:35 3 (_ _) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 640:9 2 (for-each # > =EF=BF=BD) > In /gnu/store/cgnrsi20mwcm1s3z9ab8qw125m73l4qd-module-import/guix/build/g= nu-build-system.scm: > 799:31 1 (_ _) 369:6 0 (check #:target _ #:make-flags _ #:tests? _ > # _ # _ # _) >=20 > /gnu/store/cgnrsi20mwcm1s3z9ab8qw125m73l4qd-module-import/guix/build/gnu-= build-system.scm:369:6: > In procedure check: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(# &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: ("check") exit-status: 2 > term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 80a8ee0>)'. note: keeping build > directory `/tmp/guix-build-gst-plugins-base-1.14.1.drv-1' builder for > `/gnu/store/0lzpcgpwssrw3n2kfqcr3qrx2h13ygcy-gst-plugins-base-1.14.1.drv' > failed with exit code 1 note: keeping build directory > `/tmp/guix-build-samba-4.8.4.drv-1' cannot build derivation > `/gnu/store/b8pngas13rjxznfc0wcpicp82zwbpj8n-wine-staging-3.13.drv': > 1 dependencies couldn't be built cannot build derivation > `/gnu/store/vhq2c33f67qjm4037y2nb7ix9sb3map0-profile.drv': 1 > dependencies couldn't be built guix package: error: build failed: > build of `/gnu/store/vhq2c33f67qjm4037y2nb7ix9sb3map0-profile.drv' > failed This failure is not directly in wine, but in gst-plugins-base. Strangely, gst-plugins-base built directly has no problems. Only as a dependency it somehow builds a different derivation and then the test fails. I have discussed it here already: #32360 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32360 Can you merge the two bugs? Can you help with that problem? Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/F=KgYXYo=l0zCXzTBhngC4A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlt2/IMACgkQvyhstlk+X/3vqACgsctf+lYUqqzhdCqeIzAdKy10 plQAoJ6BXkfh2I5i4MxNM/j8jUPt3VZa =nSIL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F=KgYXYo=l0zCXzTBhngC4A--