From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#32439: guix pull as root generates too many errors. Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:06:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20180816210622.GB29448@jasmine.lan> References: <20180814203608.GA16340@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqPU1-0007R6-U7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:07:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqPTy-0007fg-NZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:07:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqPTy-0007fc-Fm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqPTy-0001h0-Ae for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:07:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: fis trivial Cc: "32439@debbugs.gnu.org" <32439-done@debbugs.gnu.org> --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 09:07:04PM +0000, fis trivial wrote: > As root user, it's guile@2.0.14. Indeed, installing guile@2.2.4 from Guix= fixes > the problem. Thanks for your insight. :) =20 Great! By the way, Guix *does* work with Guile 2.0. The messages you saw should not prevent using Guix. Guix was using Guile 2.0, which was finding some pre-compiled Guile 2.2 objects. Guile 2.0 printed those messages to say that it did not recognize the precompiled objects and had to recompile them. > I thought Guix is self-contained, so are you implying that Guix itself is= not > reproducible? Is it reasonable to request making Guix self-contained? Guix is not self-contained. Its dependencies are listed in the manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Requirements.html As for whether or not it could or should be self-contained, answering that is outside of my expertise. I think there is no bug to fix here, right? Please re-open the bug if I am wrong. --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlt1504ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiKfRAAm0PlszhjEQng4FBgjY/z8Qb3fBjPE1QG0oUPgK0bBpsjS+nOLu285KJ5 5E+llWfZcdfoRiDNV51jtdXOxKsUBQVif6cec65ErzA4v+4U4PY7I9amFahyPyY5 pZXvlLQg/kBh7r3csMx4sS9KvOsoi7t3S5LFEbL+pnrmIViB241Ns5vqS3K37WK+ a1ywhmOj11V7ljJlsVoWLpON1CvpYqaQX/sPTnK+FaFf9nQOJghc/5LgyRfjm1FT aaC3R0f6K95tDvRPRUZIJahA/M7WYsoeCLi0zow0ssi9cI2zdaGBPIrg9UArielB pBFaUMA8qk2Ada3g3ogbUwo+PNnQo1V9lvQ9fdwhlQxWMmB+IJU2Ret2Ryd9wqF5 o/mvSseKxHj+Ak01W02or8yn0iyX9Ei96LwH9lqw+Kzw/Lu4e6ULFYyJa7+LdkuN OCnzk8F6PwRzojg2dp9RzlU+zBaLY94VPJqxM9XY6dpUlfQ1CkGiMM3+cdLG+eCj TeKEB1DeyVyYsfjsOxTPh4RIHQZNp0SDLikDVT9Km2ojyEEEof8QY6xMIC7gpHk7 Q2dcaoxS8DYSBeQBpCJtm/S1k30E1bfK/md0hmktePDBFn3vYZtboQokcY6kTGM8 meT6ne6xIweclz+ezAFB4IAR/EGqQ2+1mprom2xQ4QfBrendqac= =kikb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX--