From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#24404: "calibre" package fails to build. Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:52:25 +0300 Message-ID: <20180721185225.GQ4585__3662.5798362822$1532199072$gmane$org@macbook41> References: <20180628170155.11a28321@mailbox.org> <20180721173203.GA10747@jurong> <20180721181358.GA892@jurong> <20180721183830.GP4585@macbook41> <20180721184822.GA12005@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="65fUfJaAyj3QT6Mb" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgx07-000643-7n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgx02-0007Fe-QF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgx02-0007FX-LX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgx02-0004gQ-8f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180721184822.GA12005@jurong> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Andreas Enge Cc: 24404@debbugs.gnu.org, "help-guix@gnu.org" , Matthew Brooks --65fUfJaAyj3QT6Mb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 08:48:22PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:38:30PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > I see a new version of Calibre was just pushed to master, does that > > build as expected? >=20 > Yes and no; it builds, but then using it fails with > ... > File "/gnu/store/brj5xv8zqa1w7byz8b1fz0fd1hmy3kd4-calibre-3.28.0/lib/ca= libre/calibre/gui2/comments_editor.py", line 17, in > from PyQt5.QtWebKitWidgets import QWebView, QWebPage > ImportError: No module named QtWebKitWidgets >=20 > Gentoo moved to a new snapshot of qtwebkit: > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8226560.html?sid=3Dcdd617a96f698= cdc99a6156a22a4a54f > They claim this solved their problems. >=20 > The current git server of qtwebkit is here: > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebkit.git >=20 > I am downloading version 5.212.0-alpha2 from here: > https://github.com/annulen/webkit/releases > and will give it a try. >=20 > Andreas >=20 I see, debian moved to the same source. I am worried though that that repo hasn't seen any action in 6 months. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --65fUfJaAyj3QT6Mb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAltTgOUACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1FuWxAAqzOpe5jQ+UvPXgAwL3bQ5bRhSTZ1svjCYkPrEexM2jrpJam3xJUxwJlL 7xLj9D2yxume0aNPOCcazhwKgBSsJGz78Habq/6SkdL+TmcJj9vrbaRkRN30XF// nPyjwKtiDQI/8BtuPLsiu7qM8d+WUWkIrH0wPkBDEEMXdbDrmKtCYPljiSQuoaeG vbTDC27gTmVjSd9bRnyQ/hSs6vcdcjzbSiWVY1N59BC3HjSpDtQHodr5BW80RZ1Y qly18L38Ba5V24yt5f079+I0zpQ6Ud4rMwqxwXxg5Oeo91AAbH2n68iOySNA7ae8 wRUprA4fuTeq3pwNPZYAVDDhcujML5Umh39Llzso5DT3wLRORAyPfKLh3PQlSE8D w92SbPGZajxRfXwle3Jv6ProiDuZPH30FQqKkBDwRCbfpwZaG3y/ls1CI2c1eAxS m9qdWgX9xWgthM2Hv3PsbVYJKa7gaWH+dibTb218xb1/B32U5aV3EpD7cSw/uvBu sGgVN8x8EAQxvp0KcnkbBKOPIbSK1g2lfQPQcjhPBjfTfrScrDju/cTVT2hp+PYl KGC13Eip+iD/2+HuiDQU5c68M781d0NF3CUjzvblRklyrHZXbxPNAOqeSM39eOXF zVV3IkkRBmQmMBMKs2K+3VVvboo4ymVl2vy2GPOC1DnojyueVPw= =b/gg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --65fUfJaAyj3QT6Mb--