From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#32126: call-with-temporary-directory rarely cleans up after itself Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:34:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20180713213430.GA30184@jasmine.lan> References: <20180711185937.GA16510@jasmine.lan> <87pnzsv51t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fe5iU-0001Vc-9q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:35:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fe5iQ-0004bB-Cj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:35:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fe5iQ-0004ay-8B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fe5iQ-0007Sn-1X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:35:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnzsv51t.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32126-done@debbugs.gnu.org --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:37:18PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > Leo Famulari skribis: >=20 > > Should we alter the call-with-temporary-directory procedure to use > > ((guix build utils) delete-file-recursively)? >=20 > Yes, definitely. Note that you can alter (guix utils) without fear of a > full rebuild, so you can go ahead and do that in =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. Great, pushed as 27f7cbc91d1963118e44b14d04fcc669c9618176. --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAltJGuYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhrPBAAl3Oa5SIgMQXpf4kKXX0YQssjdxSFCWUh/F1xGhQgHrmnO3lRcNmt4dWn 4zn+Zn/oOt5JmsCmtvHGi+CiY9c+WLcdsFJP+4YU4ciHRd4sO3S4WyvbUHurVKe1 qYDKa9XuuGAB27p79cnXyJgPqTjAWdwk6/FbHk3Cn5V6ZsGYEKZ9JMdJSWdGrJGT 3qSjcYTnjzpdJs2lOoXm9/X8naLsCEeBJrxq1NDcrGl1hwrpaoMFk60xEgrmUayK CzeJAswT+FqDB+rHhj966RUUAZbZn+KDPdJnjEtk447UMIcoF0kIWyhj6qmaGjFb m8ZuCi42KTtHPFaacPVbT6pMTLSZf/Qt0xzkMrREMzVszyUNtapQfhqm4oLlWKu3 fyBANy4hSchdMQzZKoumLnNGyNQ85EuW/ku2R7cWiss41JPZtv+f8/ao0BduH7b0 tiTQhE1WYjKBXaww+Z8+TlT7ld7y08WOjEb+CZu1kBytf6OV7t6rIYAcN9c2Az8Q EyHvs5p3cXl3SZoA/L4aGc3f9j/xxvaPLc5j1/hD4VOguqNjjAfYPZbISRTMGg7h JKsdDZv6DYA//+MxHzw4tKsjHfXBcSBuxWWlykfK4DhEDW2UI9ND4P7nGCK4+iHd vJ6Famn6nQZY5JL1oWBufPzOQa6HKJfWrS6yXjhgdQSzd9hkfK4= =MFOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--